Light From the First Days of Creation

Institute for Creation Research ^ | February 2003 | Russell Humphreys, Ph.D.

[MineralMan]

"You just have to unlearn the evo hoax (( erosian )) // ruse (( old earth )) !
"

There ya' go again. More word salad. You know, we have a wonderful language, capable of expressing every nuance of our ideas. Try it.

[Sloth]

Creation "scientists" are just as biased and unscientific as evolutionists.

[MineralMan]

"The odds of having ALL the Age of the Universe measurements agree are about much less than 1 to the 720th power.
"

But that's nothing to God, right? If goddidit, it would all be perfect. I tell you, goddidit just to fool his humans. It's in Genesis, along with the 10 dimensions, I'm sure.

[MineralMan]

"You speak as someone who has never looked at real rock outcrops.
"

Bingo.

[f.Christian]

bm1 ...

Explain The Hawaiin Islands then.


42 posted on 01/31/2003 11:32 PM PST by Burkeman1

fC ...

I've lived in both . . . N. California and Maui - - -

and I see EXACTLY some of the same geology --- similarities here !

A christmas tree farmer living upcountry told me . . . "only the monterey pine grow wells here" !

[MineralMan]

"A christmas tree farmer living upcountry told me . . . "only the monterey pine grow wells here" !
"

f,

See, that's where you go wrong. You listen to christmas tree farmers who can't speak English properly.

[f.Christian]

Bug-eyed -- brain-dead evolution is over ...

when the rotting corpes stinks enough ---

it will have to be buried // forgotten !

[MineralMan]

"and I see EXACTLY some of the same geology --- similarities here !
"

Interesting, since Hawaii is made up of islands formed by undersea volcanos, while California is formed completely differently. There's almost no similarity between the two. Look it up on the web. The geological history of both places are quite well understood by those who bother to look beyond their religious biases.

[geopyg]

Speaking of time and velocity, I seem to recall a disucssion about the "Big Bang" saying that at some small time after the "bang" the "universe" was some huge number in size (like at 1 millisec it was 2 light-years diameter).

Anyway - the point was that at the very early stages things were moving WAY faster than the speed of light! Either the physics that we observe/theorize doesn't work at the early stages, or I wonder if other dimensions were somehow brought into play and "made visible".

Pretty cool stuff to think about.

Now, from a recent cartoon in the newspaper:

"If you could build a time machine, would you go back in time to study more for the math test, or go forward in time and skip the test?"

"If I could build a time machine, I don't think I'd be too worried about a math test".

(That reminds me - April 15th is fast approaching.)

[f.Christian]

You speak as someone who has never looked at real rock outcrops.

[MineralMan]

"Bug-eyed -- brain-dead evolution is over ...

"

There's never been any such thing. Evolution has nothing to do with being brain-dead. Sorry, f.Christian, but you're quite incorrect. Now, if you understood anything about geology or biology, I'd be tempted to listen to you...at least I would if you would write in English. But that's not the case. Anyone who thinks Hawaii and California have similar geological histories knows nothing about geology. Sorry, f.Christian.

[MineralMan]

"You speak as someone who has never looked at real rock outcrops.
"

Gosh, really? Since I've spend much of my adult life doing just that, I guess you're incorrect. Don't mess in fields you don't understand.

[f.Christian]

Ground lava (( 'cool' )) and volcana lava (( hot )) appear to be at most 50 -- 50 ...


wouldn't be surprised here in Hawaii --- if it was less than 30 % 'hot' and more than 70 % 'cool' !

Evolution geology is 90 % unfounded -- bias // HOAX --- off the wall (( dumb )) !

The BIG lie === evolution !

[nmh]

Thanks for the ping. I'll be reading through this later.

[MineralMan]

"Ground lava (( 'cool' )) and volcana lava (( hot )) appear to be at most 50 -- 50 ...
"

What? Can you restate that, in English, please.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the heads up!

[f.Christian]

Use your own brain w/o the saw dust -- cobwebs !

[longshadow]

Anyway - the point was that at the very early stages things were moving WAY faster than the speed of light! [emphasis added]

Correction: "things" weren't moving faster than the speed of light; space itself was expanding faster than the speed of light. The "things" IN space just go along for the ride.

The former is a violation of the the Theory of Special Relativity; the latter is not.

[colorado tanker]

string theory or, as it's called these days, "M"-theory

I actually made it through a book on string theory a few years ago. Interesting, but weird science. When did the name change?