[AppyPappy]

1. Do you support, or oppose a rape exception to any scheme of law outlawing abortion.

In the case of rape, the child is an innocent victim

2. Would you have forced the raped 9 year old in Nicaragua (discussed on several threads) to bear a child.

Red herring. The child assumes too much risk to birth a child.

3. Do you require absolute, beyond all reasonable doubt proof that a pregnancy to term will kill a mother before you will allow an abortion.

Nonsense. The doctor decides that ahead of time in all cases.

4. Do you oppose giving a rape victim a D&C, or abortifacient drugs like a morning after pill immediately after a rape, on the basis that a human soul may have been created?

Since we don't know whether a baby is present, it's not the same as abortion. Of course, the pill should be legal. People have been taking them since the 70's.

[Aquinasfan]

Since we don't know whether a baby is present, it's not the same as abortion.

Then why would anyone want to kill it?

[craig_eddy]

Since we don't know whether a baby is present, it's not the same as abortion.

So, if we burn down a building without knowing that whether or not anyone is inside, have we not committed murder as well as arson?