Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boot Hill
the big deal is that it took 15E9 years to get that galaxy to that distant point and another 10E9 years for the light to get back to us and that is a total of 25E9 years in a universe only 15E9 years old!

That would have been a "paradox" even one second into the universe.

The one second travel time away from the center + the one second of time if took for the light to get back to the center = 2 seconds, which is > the one second that was the age of the universe at that time.

Instant paradox!

In our hypothetical, either the age of the universe number is off, the distance to the outer edge is off, or the speed of light is off... this is where the interesting speculation comes in.... which one is off any why?

56 posted on 02/28/2003 3:16:19 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317
Teacher317 suggests:  "...either the age of the universe number is off, the distance to the outer edge is off, or the speed of light is off..."

Or a fourth possibility: We are off!
Ichneumon seems to think so. Check his post 40

--Boot Hill

58 posted on 02/28/2003 3:31:45 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson