Skip to comments.
Islamist 'enabler' threatens 'grave harm to Bush presidency,' Gaffney warns
Center for Security Policy ^
| 26 February 2003
| Frank Gaffney
Posted on 02/26/2003 1:50:19 PM PST by Fred Mertz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 381-395 next last
To: Poohbah
So, are you trying to say that you're a Grover Norquist kind of a person?
To: ravingnutter
I did tell the story on Saturday night....on one of these threads!
62
posted on
02/26/2003 8:50:59 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: Fred Mertz
No, I'm an anti-Clymer kind of person--nothing personal against you, it's just my policy.
63
posted on
02/26/2003 8:52:23 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
LIBERALS ARE up to their old tricks again. Twenty years of treason hasn't slowed them down.
Earlier prescient advice from the anti-American crowd has included: dismantling government intelligence agencies "brick by brick"; toppling the Shah of Iran and giving Islamic fundamentalism its first real foothold in the Mideast; turning the U.S. armed forces into a feminist consciousness-raising session; demanding continued dependence on Arab oil in order to preserve mud flats in Alaska; indignantly opposing a missile defense shield; promoting endless due process rights for aliens who are illegal, diseased or criminal; disarming the public; and purging the nation of insidious references to God.
Most people would be embarrassed at a track record like that, especially after Sept. 11. But instead of hanging their heads in shame, liberals have boldly returned to their typical hysteria and defeatism.
http://www.anncoulter.org/columns/2001/101801.htm
64
posted on
02/26/2003 8:53:24 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: Sabertooth; Poohbah
Well, I tried.So did I. I asked you a simple question. What do you think "enough of this crap" means, if it doesn't mean "don't do it anymore"?
Don't answer. I don't care. I know what it means, even if you guys don't.
65
posted on
02/26/2003 8:54:31 PM PST
by
DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
( "It was total manipulation. He was trying to confuse me, and it worked." - Nigel Tufnel)
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
What do you think "enough of this crap" means, if it doesn't mean "don't do it anymore"? If you don't like it, don't bump it, Fräu Göbels. Free exchange of opinions is often welcome on FR.
To: Fred Mertz
Okay. I'll ask you. What part of "enough of this crap" don't you understand?
67
posted on
02/26/2003 9:02:16 PM PST
by
DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
( "It was total manipulation. He was trying to confuse me, and it worked." - Nigel Tufnel)
To: Chad Fairbanks
Yes, I am sure you did.
68
posted on
02/26/2003 9:05:14 PM PST
by
Jael
(Matthew 5:13 ¶Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour.........)
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
If you're trying to get this article thrown into the Smokey Backroom, you're failing. Good night.
To: Poohbah
There is a point to this, and it's quite apparent to anyone with any sort of sense.
Those people posting these articles over, and over, have an agenda in mind.
What could that agenda be?
It's quite clear when you realize that they concentrate their efforts on allegations and innuendo meant to destabilize the readers, and maybe even chip away at the more marginal supporters of the current administration.
These posters, donning the trappings of ultra patriots over their true persona in order to hide their real intentions, claim to be concerned for the well being of the president and the nation.
Bunk.
Their agenda is revealed by the fact that their every post is an attempt at creating negativism, and they point out what few issues have yet to be addressed or resolved by the administration, in order to cast shadows over its wealth of accomplishments. Accomplishments they never, ever acknowledge.
You would ask yourself what true conservative would violate Reagans 11th. Commandment?
You ask yourself why anyone seeking to advance the conservative agenda would constantly undermine the administration?
You ask yourself why they do not realize that these sorts of attacks may have the long-range effect of harming the continued forward movement of the GOP platform, and the demoralization of the Democrats?
Then you come to the realization that in asking the questions, you have successfully answered them.
70
posted on
02/26/2003 9:08:44 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
To: TLBSHOW; Chad Fairbanks; Ann Coulter; Sabertooth; Jael; Fred Mertz
Thanks for the great reminder of a great lady. May her memory live on.
71
posted on
02/26/2003 9:08:53 PM PST
by
Jael
(Matthew 5:13 ¶Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour.........)
To: Poohbah
I am a skeptic also..
But look <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/852179/posts?q=1&&page=131#131'>HERE</A> <P> There's something to this, Norquist is shilling for a guy who admits funding PA terror through the Holy Land Foundation even after the Government shut it down. <P> Something isn't right with all of this.
72
posted on
02/26/2003 9:09:57 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
(Jhoffa_X)
To: Jhoffa_
73
posted on
02/26/2003 9:10:45 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
(Jhoffa_X)
To: Jhoffa_
Talking to yourself?
74
posted on
02/26/2003 9:11:45 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
To: Fred Mertz
I'm not trying to get it thrown in the SB, Fred. I don't care where it is. I'm just trying to figure out how you guys justify thumbing your noses at Jim.
75
posted on
02/26/2003 9:12:02 PM PST
by
DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
( "It was total manipulation. He was trying to confuse me, and it worked." - Nigel Tufnel)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Check out the link in #73 first..
It's really odd the people this Norquist surrounds himself with and lobbies for.
76
posted on
02/26/2003 9:12:36 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
(Jhoffa_X)
To: Luis Gonzalez
the continued forward movement of the GOP platformLuis, are you at all concerned that some of the main supporters of the GOP will move away from the GOP if they find out that while the military is being sent to die, advisors to the adminstration (like Grover) are bring in pro terrorist Muslims?
I am.
True conservatives need to be working to bring the party back to the right so the biggest parts of the party don't bolt.
77
posted on
02/26/2003 9:13:28 PM PST
by
Jael
(Matthew 5:13 ¶Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour.........)
To: Luis Gonzalez
I prefer to think of it as: "striving for excellence in conversation.."
78
posted on
02/26/2003 9:13:56 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
(Jhoffa_X)
To: Jhoffa_
Thanks for the post!
79
posted on
02/26/2003 9:14:20 PM PST
by
Jael
(Matthew 5:13 ¶Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour.........)
To: Luis Gonzalez
You would ask yourself what true conservative would violate Reagans 11th. Commandment? Get your head out of the clouds Luis. This is just a web site........sheesh! You'd think we're on international TV or sumpin'.
p.s. Does my hair look okay to you? LOL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 381-395 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson