Islamist 'enabler' threatens 'grave harm to Bush presidency,' Gaffney warns

Center for Security Policy ^ | 26 February 2003 | Frank Gaffney

[justshe]

So what if Sami gave that picture to the AP. What does that prove?

My sister had HER picture taken with the President while he was campaigning and gave it to the Statesman Journal.

Is there something sinister in HER actions too?

[EastCoast]

Thanks! In case it hasn't been mentioned, al-Arian's son interned for Bonior. Have to say that I saw al-Arian's wife on tv yesterday and she seems like an awfully nice lady.

[Jael]

I'm not trying to do anything but post on a thread. You however have said heinious things that are not one bit true. You are disrupting this thread. Why in God's name would you ever do something like call a person a democrat?

Have you no honor? Have you no shame?

The best think for you to do is (instead of trolling me around the forum casting aspersions upon my good name) find a topic you want to discuss and stick with it and get off the personal attacks.

[Jael]

For the record? Then Cultural Jihad,you might want to pull the original post. Oh, but that would show you to be a liar!!!!!

But there have been certain situations when many in the conservative circles I run it have longed for a more conservate action from the Whitehouse.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

ROTFL - you are brazen, if nothing else.

You're a real groin-kicker, you know that? You fight like James Carville.

[TLBSHOW]

I didn't think you would know why it was important. Since you aren't reading the links there is no more I have to say to you, except Grover is taking no action against Frank for the charges against him. That is the bottom line.

[Jael]

I just believe what the Bible says. Attack me for my faith, go right ahead.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

I'm not trying to do anything but post on a thread.

LOL - OMG! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Here comes the innocent routine...

[justshe]

So not defending oneself is tantamount to guilt. Interesting philosophy.....stupid, but interesting.

[Sabertooth]

To what end? So he posted a multitude of articles, along with you, all saying the same damned things. People read the first one, commented on it and debated it then made up their minds. The question has to be asked.....why not leave it at that and be satisfied?

Because there is new information posted all the time. When you first read about this, were you aware that Suhail Khan, who worked in the White House, is the son of a man who helped raise funds for Al Qaeda?

Or that Norquist's co-founder of the Islamic Institute, Khaled Saffuri, sponsors children of homicide bombers in Israel?

This isn't the first story that's required more than one thread in order to gather and archive all the information.

I'm gonna repost something from another thread today, but I think it's pertinent...

Let me tell you a story that may give you reason to reconsider your objections to certain articles getting posted on more than one thread, and multiple threads on similar articles.

Recently, I was doing some amateur research on the anthrax attacks attacks in the Fall of 2001. I was surprised, while running search engines, at how many articles no longer had valid links. Some news orgs appear to be particularly sloppy about their archives.

Fortunately, I was able to find many of these articles posted on other websites, especially on Free Republic. Without FR, quite a bit of information might have disappeared down the memory hole. Also, while scrolling through the associated threads, I came across other links and articles I might not otherwise have seen. There is a definite value in this type of crossreferencing.

As I read on, there were details deep in some articles that weren't as apparently important at the original time of posting, but in hindsight take on greater significance. Such is the case in the article I posted at #49 on this thread, which you (cyncooper) referenced. In addition, not all versions of the same article have identical information.

It's important to keep in mind that not everyone has kept up on this story, and may not have seen certain articles when they were posted earlier. In order to reference a certain point when made to a poster new to the story, a previously posted article may get reposted. There is another value in this, in that someone may notice something about that reposted article, and comment on it, shedding new light on the story.

In light of all that, I don't see any real reason to object to multiple repostings of articles in the context of numerous threads about an ongoing story.

Isn't the point of this forum to post news articles and engage in constructive commentary about those articles?

[justshe]

Victimization is the next step. I've seen the M.O. before. Although....there is SOMETHING of a pickle tonight, because JR has already been pinged to this thread. Don't know who will come to the rescue.

[Jael]

Have a nice evening! God bless you!!!

[Texasforever]

I just believe what the Bible says. Attack me for my faith, go right ahead.

Osama believes also.

[Jael]

Isn't the point of this forum to post news articles and engage in constructive commentary about those articles?

Excellent post.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

You lie all freaking night, then question my "honor", then say, "God bless you!!!"

You're not real.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Well, I'm just calling 'em like I see 'em. If I have to pay for it, I've got my wallet out.

[Jael]

Do you believe that the religion and god Osama serves are the one the majority of Christians in America serve?

[Jael]

Really, I will forgive you for the things you said. God bless you. Take care.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

ROTFL! I get it! You're being funny!!

[Texasforever]

I keep asking why this is that important? Norquist is subject to criminal sanction if he has broken any laws, the terrorist is arrested and the Whitehouse has been fumigated. I know nothing at all about Norquist or this other guy beyond the little spat they are having in the ethernet. You still have not made a case that warrants this obsession with you and TLB. There are many on the conservative side, not me, that are very uncomfortable about Perle and Wolfowitz influence given their strident support of Israel. I have seen many threads pulled around here, mostly from Ranainbo that try to make that linkage into a Bush problem, those threads are pulled justifiably because Justin has an agenda that is not to post facts but to post half truths to support his anti-Semitic drivel. I see the same kind of thing going on here and it is really tiresome.