Youre right, among the principles 242 sets out, is a call for for termination of all states of belligerency, violated on numerous occasions by the arab states.
And it calls for negotiating a withdrawl "from territories, not "all", the result of negotiations prior to the resolutions adoption which recognized Israel would need to retain some territory for defensive reasons.
The Pentagons interpritation of "defensive borders" in 74 is below, similar to the Joint Chiefs of Staff recommendation in 68. Youll note it suggests Israel retains about 60% of the West Bank, returning the rest to Jordan, all of Gaza and chunks of the Sinai, returning the rest to Egypt. If instituted, this plan would have returned well over 80% of the disputed territory while providing secure boundries for Israel.
The Joint Chiefs speaking in 68
The Chiefs made the following specific findings:
"The prominent high ground running north-south through the middle of West Jordan [Judea and Samaria] generally...would provide Israel with a militarily defensible border."
"The commanding territory east of the boundary of 4 June 1967 [the Golan Heights]...overlooks the Galilee area. To provide a defense in-depth, Israel would need a strip about 15 miles wide extending from the border of Lebanon to the border of Jordan."
"By occupying the Gaza Strip, Israel would trade approximately 45 miles of hostile border for eight. Configured as it [was prior to 1967], the strip serve[d] as a salient for introduction of Arab subversion and terrorism and its retention would be to Israel's military advantage."
"To defend the Jerusalem area would require that the boundary of Israel be positioned to the east of the city to provide for the organization of an adequate defensive position."
Wrong. Resolution 242 does not call for a termination of "all" states of belligerency. Read the text. It says, "Termination of all claims or states of belligerency...".
It does not say, "Termination of all claims or all states of belligerency...".
I rest my case. But I made it for a reason. And that was to make you think.
If I had 10 pencils and you took all of them and I asked for "a return of pencils taken", how many would you return? Do you realize how silly you would look if you say anything other than 10? Do you think you could return 8 because I didn't ask for "all" of them?
Do you think I will be happy with 8? Is it because you're much bigger than me that you'll decide how many to give me, and I should be happy I got any at all?