Replies

OK, for some reason, the following post of mine was removed:

Self-worship and hubris are the heart of Libertarianism. 364 posted on 03/04/2003 12:30 AM PST by Roscoe

Uh huh. So says "Roscoe", that great Theologian of the >>>Anti-Christians.<<<<

Thirty yards from where I type these words, it is entirely possible that my neighbor is smoking a marijuana cigarette.
If this be the case, then as a Christian I have one of two Moral Options:
I may seek to preach to him the Immorality of Private Intoxication (the "Doctor Machen", Orthodox Presbyterian option).

>>>>>I may seek to blow his head off (the "Doctor Roscoe",
State-Idolatry option).<<<<<<

And so I must ask...
What Would Jesus Do?
"What Would Jesus Do?" Never mind, Roscoe...
As you are one who expressly denies the Factual Inerrancy of Christian Ethics... you wouldn't even know.
I respectfully request of the "Administrative Moderator" a Private "FreepMail" Explanation of WHY this post was removed.
It was NOT judgmental on my part to affirm that "Roscoe" is not a Christian, he does not even CLAIM to be a Christian!! If a Man EXPRESSLY DENIED that he was a Constitutionalist, would you remove a post which examined the political implications of the fact that he EXPRESSLY DENIED that he was a Constitutionalist?
This is not "rabble-rousing" on my part, nor do I care for any such thing. I simply and respectfully request a Private "FreepMail" explanation of why this Post was removed.
Thanks, OP #381

-Dr roscoe replies:-

Self-worship and hubris are the heart of Libertarianism. The Administrative Moderator doesn't owe you an explanation.
395 posted on 03/04/2003 8:50 AM PST by Roscoe

To: Roscoe
Self-worship and hubris are the heart of Libertarianism.
Well put.
396 -hv-

No, It wasn't "well put" even the first time roscoe said it, probably several years ago, nor for hundredth time repeated it, just above. - Roscoe is simply spamming & disrupting the forum, not adding to the discussions.

His goal is well illustrated in the 'removed' reply. - Roscoe goads, then, - when responded to in kind, - he presses 'abuse' on imagined infractions, such as the above >>>>>bracketed<<<<<< remarks, which are at ~best~ a complete stretch of any violation of the posting guidelines.

Simply put, you fanatical libertarian haters cannot rationalise/debate, so you try to get your opposition to shut up.
- How juvenile.