Memos warn Iraq planning terror spree

New York Daily News ^ | 2/26/03 | JAMES GORDON MEEK

[m1-lightning]

If Sadam uses WMD's then the demo/peacenicks will blame the republicans and Bush.

(in a sarcastic voice)But according to the peace movement, Saddam doesn't have weapons of mass destruction, nor is he proven to be linked to terrorism in anyway.

It's a catch 22 for Bush. The democrats will blame him either way because he is a Republican. That's the bottom line.

[Trust but Verify]

Do you think 'unconventional' weapons will be used against our troops? I don't.

Clinton and Carter are a whole new topic. Shame on them both. Words cannot convey the disgust and contempt I have for them, as they do for their own country.

[John Robertson]

stop thinking like a freeper. if he launches WMD against our people, or if freelancers attack americans anywhere on the globe, the antiwar people will wail, Look, look what W. made him do! It's our fault, it's our fault! If we'd only worked for peace, they never would have used the weapons and tactics (that we've been saying they didn't have anyway).

[bonesmccoy]

You have posted a remarkably succinct and concise portrait of the same activity we have noticed in our area. Unfortunately, it appears much of the 5th Column element may be inserted into a property owning position.

We have noted that much of the property in the area is (ironically) tied to ownership that is foreign.

We appear to have permitted major land valuation and business asset valuation to be linked to foreign countries, specifically the socialists in China, Canada, and other nations.

While these socialists claim that they want "things" for the people, the reality is that they simply are building wealth transfer vehicles for their own family leverage.

Many of the anti-War and moveon.org funders appear to be tied to the 5th column element.

Many of the protestors appear to be focused on the anti-Bush/anti-War protest message and yet do not have any inclination to evaluate who is funding these activities.

Interestingly, when we did our analysis of who was funding some of the anti-War websites, we came up with no data in the DNS search engine.

Perhaps my software is not performing correctly, but when you can get info for other sites; it suggests that the software is performing and that someone deleted the pointers to the anti-war site data.

Interesting isn't it?

This war will be fought in Iraq.

But, there is a real tangible fight brewing in our borders.

If we are not careful, we will undermine our Constitution while struggling over the 5th Column in our nation.

Further discussion of these generalities and specifics are needed through this site so that people can cross compare the following:

1 property ownership in various areas of the nation
2 business investment in buildings in various areas
3 political activity by various NGOs in different areas of the country (and cross compare the individuals appearing at such events)

[dix]

That’s a Freeper for you, ever vigilant. Way to keep up on those looneys.

[goodnesswins]

And, then there is this...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/851920/posts

Describes Anti-war activists planning civil disobedience when the war starts....

[ErnBatavia]

The lib/dems MUST be forced to eat crow....including Sheryl.

There's a Bill Clinton joke here just begging to be told; but I have too much decorum to proceed....

[Coop]

A Feb. 11 agency memo reported that "at the onset of hostilities" with Iraq, Al Qaeda and other terrorists "will launch anti-U.S. terrorist operations, probably in the U.S. and Arabian Peninsula," where more than 150,000 G.I.s are assembling an invasion force.

But on Feb. 13, the agency said terrorists might attack U.S. interests if war "appears imminent."

Or the cowardly terrorists will just launch more attacks against us for doing absolutely nothing at all, a la September 11, 2001. So if we're gonna get hit anyways, makes the decision kinda simple, doesn't it?

[I'm ALL Right!]

"We are quite familiar with who these agents are," the source said.

I know they are waiting to see those "agents" do something that is incriminating...but I don't want to lose more innocent Americans for the sake of capturing a couple of terrorists. Solve the problem before we are attacked.

[FoxGirl]

Not a chance -- the chorus of "Bush escalated the war to this level" will be absolutely deafening.

Same here. It worries me that they will just blame it on Bush. It wouldn't have happened if we hadn't gone into Iraq, etc. Blech.

[concerned about politics]

Do you think 'unconventional' weapons will be used against our troops? I don't.

Yep. Anything for him to survive. He'll use all he's got and go out in "glory for Allah." I know he's not religious, but it'll get the Islamofacists riled enough to continue his hate for the US after he's gone (escaped, of course. Not dead) . The guys a kook!

[JasonC]

But how can this be? There are no links between Iraq and international terrorism. There can't be. There is no "smoking gun". The left and the French say so, therefore it must be true.

[DAnconia55]

You are assuming that the peaceniks are rational. They will blame Bush - count on it.

Most of you who have replied misunderstand me.

I don't think the leftists will WANT to shut up. But if they open their mouths after we're hit, anyone with in ear shot will beat the snot out of them.

They will be effectively silenced.

[PFKEY]

John, You are trying to apply logic to a liberal motive.

You know better.

Tisk, Tisk.

[Cvengr]

(jamming my tinfoil hat firmly in place with this one)

My sentiments as well, on face value, although also recognizing some pretty strange things seem to be happening on the topic lending some credance to its suggestion. I remain open to more common sensical explanations such as laziness, human character, and stupidity, but conspiracy is one possible form of infamous character.

[Cvengr]

Yeppers,...only problem is that keeping up on the loons doesn't seem to promote a balanced mental viewpoint, so one needs to avoid it on many an occcaion. I've found Scriptural study and application is far more fruitful regardless of how unpopular it might appear.

[Cvengr]

NGO's---Non-Governmental Organizations,....acronym used frequently in regards to UN organizational funding and direction of international efforts. Red Cross and The Nature Conservancy would probably qualify as NGOs. When international humanitarian crises are identified, sorted and funded, the justifications used are frequently based upon statistics involving Governmental and non-governmental organizations. Many non-profit organizations qualify as NGOs, although an NGO doesn't necessitate non-profit status.

[Cvengr]

Oh, I'd say there are numerous indicators that this entire issue touches much more directly upon principalities, authorities, and powers which are the real source of Christian battle as opposed to the more obvious flesh and blood.

One telltale indicator is how those who are unrighteous will run quickly to these causes. For example, who in there right mind would defend Saddam Hussein as righteous and attack the US as imperialist? Even if one were socialist, the US is far from a colonial imperialist and Hussein is far from granting power to lessor socialists.

Even conspiracy theories seem just too outlandish to explain such a rush in action opposing the US but supporting Iraq.

I don't get it,...and I seriously don't believe I need or want to, either.

[Cvengr]

I suspect the French might be complaining because the smoking gun might be French made.

[Fledermaus]

When Saddam uses his WMD, against our troops or here, it'll shut every Demon/peaceniks piehole. And make very clear to the political middle exactly who and what they are.

Are you kidding?

Every left wing moron will just be emboldend with "see, I told you so" about our "use of force will have reprecussions".

They'll build their movement for when we have to take on N. Korea, Iran, send troops to Indonesia, Phillipines, Columbia, etc.