[Stand Watch Listen]

Related Articles

Anti-war Protestors: Shades Of Stupidity
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 21, 2003; Author: Rachel Marsden

Who's Paying for It All? [re: anti-war demostrations]
Source: INSIGHT magazine; Published: February 18, 2003; Author: J. Michael Waller

Anti-War Protestors Are Warmongers for Our Enemies
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 11, 2003; Author: Alex Epstein

[HuntsvilleTxVeteran]

I found how the World had been misled by prostitute Writers, to ascribe the greatest Exploits in War to Cowards, the wisest Counsel to Fools, Sincerity to Flatterers, Roman Virtue to Betrayers of their Country, Piety to Atheists, Chastity to Sodomites, Truth to Informers.

Still valid even tho written in early 1700s
by Swift

[gregwest]

When all the war talk began, I initially opposed the war. As I have watched the various parties begin to align themselves, I've had a change of heart. Originally, my objections were these:
1. The war on terror should take priority.
2. Iraq still didn't pose a credible threat compared to our Cold War adversaries. (China is still the biggest threat and I'm still wary of Russia).
3. The aggressive posture of the United States in taking offensive action was contrary to our historical willingness to respond only when provoked.

My mind has changed because of the following observations.
1. The war on terror still is the number one priority and it is being effectively waged in the manner described by the President and SECDEF. I believe that they have quietly and secretly disrupted many terror networks both inside the US and abroad. Otherwise, we would have had more attacks since 9/11. I am convinced that way more is going on behind the scenes than we would want to know about. I am confident that, although it's not in the headlines, it still is mission #1.
2. I think the focus on Iraq is only the beginning of something much larger and that's what scares our "allies" and enemies. The push towards a transnational world order has been underway at least since WWI. The theoretical argument among the advocates of globalism is the character of world government. Will it be modeled on the US-UK model going back to Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence, and the Bill of Rights or will it be modeled on a Marxist/socialist paradigm? The advocates of these movements are moving beyond mere theory and globalization is moving forward rapidly. The US and UK together oppose the rest of Europe and the world, who have opted for the Marxist/Fabian socialist model that the EU is based on. This war will go far beyond Iraq and will ultimately settle the question of what kind of global government we'll have one day.
3. The United States has been provoked, not only by terrorists, but also our faithless allies, who now wish to reduce the greatest hope of human freedom to a servile state in a European-dominated transnational federation based on socialism. That's why France and Germany oppose us in the Security Council. The outcome of this war will determine much more on who has oil and who controls the Middle East. It will be the deciding factor on whether the American dream endures beyond the 21st century. Not only does Iraq and al-Qaeda threaten our way of life, but Germany, France, Russia, and China do also.

In liberty's cause, I support President Bush. It is no surprise that all the protest groups are leftists. The 43% of the United States that voted for Bill Clinton twice are also leftists. That means there are only half of the American people left to stand for freedom's cause. It's time to stand up and be counted. (Sorry for the melodrama there, it's schmalzy but heartfelt. Patrick Henry, I ain't!) When you go to war, you have to go for the right reason. I can't attest to the motives of his advisors, but I think George Bush's heart is in the right place. I think, for whatever reason, God has granted him a clarity of vision about the threat and the course of action he must take. I give him my support.

Greg

[Abcdefg]

Try this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/828043/posts

[Tailgunner Joe]

bttt

[U of IL Conservative]

From a student site:

Communists and Socialists support the war against Iraq

(Scroll down to second part of that blog entry...)

[DPB101]

Good for Weyrich. The Federal government has an obligation to investigate the antiwar movement. There is enough information in the public domain about Becker and Ramsey's ties to North Korea, Libya, Cuba and Iraq that not to investigate would be a dereliction of duty. The days of tagging such investigations with the term "McCarthyism" are over. That worked in 1954 before we had a controled media and no internet. Few were aware the term "McCarthyism" was coined by the Comunist Party USA and first appears in the party's newspaper before CBS, NBC and ABC picked it up and ran with it.

[jjack]

As a card-carrying communist I am glad to say that your theories about Marxist infiltration of the Anti-War movement is indeed true, although our ideological reasons for participation may be different from your average aging liberal hippie.