[judicial meanz]

Dont hold your breath!

I based this on a JAG report I saw not too long ago. The JAG report was based on the contingency of having to augment the US military with militia forces in the case of a catastrophic war. Basically a scenario to figure out what they had to do to activate the militia if needed.

The really funny thing is this- If the courts take away individual rights to firearm ownership, it has DIRECT national security implications to the unorganized militia and the ability to protect our country from external threats.

An unarmed population is also a population unable to fulfill its duty to help defend its country.

[MileHi]

An unarmed population is also a population unable to fulfill its duty to help defend its country.

And the "assault weapon" ban outlaws many of the best rifles for this purpose.

[Ancesthntr]

Do you have a link for that JAG report? It should be very interesting reading.