Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/24/2003 11:48:21 PM PST by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *Homosexual Agenda; Remedy; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Index
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search
All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

2 posted on 02/24/2003 11:48:58 PM PST by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scripter
I think the SEC should investigate this hoax to drive up tar and feather stocks.



3 posted on 02/24/2003 11:53:50 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scripter
I don't believe that what they were doing is morally right, but I don't think anyone is getting hurt by it, other than possible each other knowingly.

I just have to wonder how many people were getting murdered and raped while they were arresting and booking these dudes for poking each other in the butt. Seems like theres a better for law enforcement officers time than going after homosexuals.

Also, did they bust down the door or something? Or did they think it was the pizza guy and just told him to come in while they were going at it. I think its dumb to have laws like this that pertain to adult on adult action, but how on earth did they get caught anyway.

4 posted on 02/25/2003 12:10:33 AM PST by PropheticZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scripter

>>>"He leads police into apartment," Shackleford recounted, "and they find two men engaged in anal sodomy." <<<

Texas Physicians Resource Council, Christian Medical and Dental Association, Catholic Medical Association

II. THE PROHIBITION OF SAME-SEX SODOMY IS RATION-ALLY RELATED TO THE STATE'S INTEREST IN PUBLIC HEALTH A.

The State Has a Legitimate Interest in Regulating Public Health

This Court has long recognized the validity of state regulation of public health and morality. 6 Railroad Co. v. Husen, 95 U. S. 465, 470-71 (1877) (state's police power "is generally said to extend to making regulations promotive of domestic order, morals, health and safety"). Soon after ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, this Court held that it did not affect a state's police power:

But neither the [Fourteenth] amendment– broad and comprehensive as it is– nor any other amendment, was designed to interfere with the power of the state, some-times termed its police power, to prescribe regulations to promote the health, peace, morals, education, and good order of the people . . . .

7 Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27, 31 (1884); see also L'Hote v. City of New Orleans, 177 U. S. 587, 596 (1900) (" It has been often said that the police power was not by the Federal Constitution transferred to the nation, but was reserved to the states, and that upon them rests the duty of so exercising it as to protect the public health and morals"). The Court has continued to recognize the valid exercise of police powers promoting public health and morality in recent years. City of Erie v. Pap's A. M., 529 U. S. 277, 298 (2000) (" Erie's efforts to protect public health and safety are clearly within the city's police powers"); Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U. S. 560, 569 (1991) (" The traditional police power of the States is defined as the authority to provide for the public health, safety, and morals, and we have upheld such a basis for legislation").

8 posted on 02/25/2003 3:50:18 PM PST by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson