The definition of "endangerment" is not set out. It is too vague and allows way too much room for abuse by law officials. Is it "endangerment" to have a swimming pool if the local social worker is afraid of water; to own a gun if your pediatrician is afraid of guns? Who decides?
Once again, I think this is just a back door gun-grabber law.
I agree wholeheartedly, but it is far more than simply a law to confiscate guns. It would allow the state government the ability to institute #97's "It takes a Village" socialist programs that legalize the state's control of anything they perceive as endangering children - conservative thought, Christian education, heteosexuality, guns, child discipline other than "timeouts" etc. It would be a backdoor beyond belief.
IMHO, of course.