[Vermont Lt]

The restraint is called, "get the facts before you jump."

IF they can prove which teachers did what, then make that known. However, just as any other person is provided with due process, we should allow these teachers to get it as well. Isnt that what we stand up for?

[LibWhacker]

Charges are brought first (and not in secret), then proof is provided, not the other way around. I can understand not throwing out there for public consumption every slanderous claim which comes along, but I'm convinced something more is going on in this case. The hyperleftwing track record of the NEA and its adherents is well-known.

[Boxsford]

You are so far off base. There is no big "IF". The clear plain facts have been out there for a very long time. There is a systematic effort by teacher's unions--across this nation-- to engage in passing on liberal politics/morals to their students.

[Righty1]

You are obviously one who believes that the constitution IS A Suicide Pact! Personally, I am so sick of this S+++ that shooting first and then gathering the evidence is fine by me!

[Illbay]

...as any other person is provided with due process, we should allow these teachers to get it as well. Isnt that what we stand up for?

No teachers were named. No school board was named. I can appreciate the sentiments you express but they don't apply in this instance.

[hobbes1]

IF they can prove which teachers did what, then make that known.

I have an even better Idea. Let's sit on this, until these parents return home from doling out one ass kicking, and are ready to deliver another, after all, "It's for the Children..."