Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: "cold-blooded killers" - Colombia rebels blame U.S. for seizure of aircraft trio
Miami Herald ^ | February 22, 2003 | MARIKA LYNCH mlynch@herald.com

Posted on 02/22/2003 1:05:15 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Leisler
Oh please. If you are ignorant of this fact, you have wasted your time on FR.

Those who play games like that about info that is well established betray that they are here as trolls.

Go back to Libertarian Underground or some other fairy land.

41 posted on 02/23/2003 9:45:34 PM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
So you are a moral relativist ?

There is no such thing as universal morality ?

And your best example is pork eating ?

That is not a moral law, that is an ordinance.

So morality is not reality ? Tell that to God.

Sorry to burst your bubble but He establishes what is moral and righteous. It seems evident that you haven't met his acquaintance, otherwise you would be expressing some of His wisdom.

But maybe you've created Him in your own image, just as you have "morality."

42 posted on 02/23/2003 9:57:02 PM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: Leisler
Yes.

Glad I'm not an apologist for those who think it's moral to put stuff up their noses while providing financing for terrorists.

Have a great life LOL!!!

44 posted on 02/24/2003 4:15:04 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: All
I was out of the country and just learned about this today. Unfortunatly, I know the people involved in this crash and currently being held hostage.

Perhaps it is best not to explain exactly what their mission was and the equipment that they were using, since they are still being held hostage.

The small company I work for created the equipment they were using and we know the people involved rather well.
46 posted on 02/24/2003 9:47:59 AM PST by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
You have never indicated an ability to think morally; only to get to the lucre line.

I wonder why you exhibit such hostility and verbal bashing. It is so unnecessary on this forum.

Perhaps you don't like being bested by girls LOL!!

47 posted on 02/25/2003 1:29:42 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
"You have never indicated an ability to think morally; only to get to the lucre line."

Another disingenuous statement from you, the anointed. My, and our entire fist four posts concern the effectiveness of economic vs. moral forces. Learn to read.

48 posted on 02/25/2003 4:12:10 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Thanks for recognizng my annointedness.

Yes, our posts discussed morallity vs. economic.

I have never argued that morality will win. I have only argued that morality IS. And it IS whether or not you agree with it.

Neither you nor I establishes morality.

I have maintained all along that those who use drugs which subsequently finances terrorism will answer to God.

YOU are the one who cannot read.

49 posted on 02/25/2003 4:36:32 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
". I have only argued that morality IS. And it IS whether or not you agree with it. "

Is-ism.

Deep.

Very enlighting. I'll make a note of it.

50 posted on 02/25/2003 6:35:11 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
It's a part of reality that is too elevated in concept for you.
51 posted on 02/25/2003 6:48:48 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: livius
while it is true that FARC does get a lot of its money from drugs, it has plenty of other sources

This is a textbook example of the all-or-nothing fallacy. The fact that cutting off black-market drug profits (which, as a practical matter, can only be accomplished by ending prohibition) would merely reduce rather than totally eliminating terrorist funding is not a persuasive argument.

52 posted on 02/25/2003 7:19:20 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
The commercials are right -- they are contributing directly to terrorism.

Arianna will be pleased that you agree with her point.

53 posted on 02/25/2003 7:20:46 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
>>Arianna will be pleased that you agree with her point.<<

I was talking about drugs, not SUVs!

54 posted on 02/25/2003 12:25:08 PM PST by freedumb2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
Victimless????? Come into the real world, Corkman.
55 posted on 02/25/2003 12:28:07 PM PST by MoGalahad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
Right, your're FR's very own little Kierkegaard.
56 posted on 02/25/2003 1:05:50 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson