Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Support for Iraq War Still Strong
foxnews ^ | February 21, 2003

Posted on 02/21/2003 3:27:15 PM PST by Indy Pendance

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:35:34 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Attila Flagellum Dei
..which ones of these countries does not depend on US aid ?...

Australia, Britain, Spain, and probably several more on the list.

41 posted on 02/21/2003 9:03:35 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
See what ya get for writing before you read?

What?

42 posted on 02/21/2003 9:15:16 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: All
These polls tick me off royally.

As someone else pointed out the questions give the impression that we are literally doing this alone. If I were a Brit, I would be pissed! Secondly, if you ask me honestly, I would love one last good U.N. resolution to demonstrate further the bankruptcy of the anit-war Left.

But the worst thing is this crap about a "second resolution." We are now on Resolution #17!!!!! So why isn't the debate about an "18th resolution?????" Is it because to label this honestly would make people go "HMMMMM?"

43 posted on 02/21/2003 10:39:51 PM PST by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins; DoughtyOne
If these sheeple had your great posting and DO's summaries, they might change their minds re the lie that we are going it alone.
44 posted on 02/22/2003 6:33:43 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Nearly six in 10 Americans, 57 percent, say the United States should get a second U.N. resolution

Tow problems with the word should. The first is it isn't MUST. I might think we should get a UN resolution but it doesn't mean its a prerequiste.

Secondly, the word "should" can be intrepreted in another way. As in, the UN "should" give a second resolution because it would be nuts not to.

45 posted on 02/22/2003 9:07:38 AM PST by VRWC_minion ( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
If we add China to the list would we get a majority in population ?
46 posted on 02/22/2003 9:08:34 AM PST by VRWC_minion ( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
"But the number of people who believe Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had any connection with terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 dropped from 66 percent in October to 57 percent now."

57%, according to a poll that claims surprising support for Blix. Something is wrong with this poll. It doesn't add up. Finding people who both admire and respect Blix yet think that Saddam was involved with 9-11? How often do you run into that kind of person?

Even these questionable numbers, however, speak of a powerful mandate for Bush to whip it out and douse Iraq with yellow koolaid if he wanted.

47 posted on 02/22/2003 3:43:37 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lysandru
But the worst thing is this crap about a "second resolution." We are now on Resolution #17!!!!! So why isn't the debate about an "18th resolution?????" Is it because to label this honestly would make people go "HMMMMM?"

I hadn't thought of it that way. Brain wakes up again. LOL.

48 posted on 02/22/2003 3:46:49 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Your visual graphics make it crystal clear. But there's only one flag of support the US truly needs if those 57% are correct about Saddam's bin laden connection-- OUR OWN! Help is apprectiated, especially from the Brits. The Aussies have a personal ax to grind, and we should respect that too. But the truth is, DEATH TO AL QUEDA SUPPORTERS! Not for the sake of the Iraqis. Liberation? Fine. But that is just icing on the cake. KILL SADDAM. KILL THE BHATH PARTY! KILL HIS VIPER SON! Exhile doesn't cut it. Political prison doesn't cut it. Nothing cuts it but death.
49 posted on 02/22/2003 3:53:58 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson