Posted on 02/21/2003 1:08:02 PM PST by I Believe It's Not Butter
Donald Rumsfeld, the US secretary of defense, was on the board of technology giant ABB when it won a deal to supply North Korea with two nuclear power plants.
Weapons experts say waste material from the two reactors could be used for so-called “dirty bombs”.
The Swiss-based ABB on Friday told swissinfo that Rumsfeld was involved with the company in early 2000, when it netted a $200 million (SFr270million) contract with Pyongyang.
The ABB contract was to deliver equipment and services for two nuclear power stations at Kumho, on North Korea’s east coast.
Rumsfeld – who is one of the Bush administration’s most strident “hardliners” on North Korea – was a member of ABB’s board between 1990 and February 2001, when he left to take up his current post.
Wolfram Eberhardt, a spokesman for ABB, told swissinfo that Rumsfeld “was at nearly all the board meetings” during his decade-long involvement with the company.
Maybe, maybe not
However, he declined to indicate whether Rumsfeld was made aware of the nuclear contract with North Korea.
“This is a good question, but I couldn’t comment on that because we never disclose the protocols of the board meetings,” Eberhardt said.
“Maybe this was a discussion point of the board, maybe not.”
The defense secretary’s role at ABB during the late 1990s has become a bone of contention in Washington.
The ABB contract was a consequence of a 1994 deal between the US and Pyongyang to allow construction of two reactors in exchange for a freeze on the North’s nuclear weapons programme.
North Korea revealed last year that it had secretly continued its nuclear weapons programme, despite its obligations under the deal with Washington.
The Bush government has repeatedly used the agreement to criticise the former Clinton administration for being too soft on North Korea. Rumsfeld’s deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, has been among the most vocal critics of the 1994 weapons accord.
Dirty bombs
Weapons experts have also speculated that waste material from the two reactors could be used for so-called “dirty bombs”.
Rumsfeld’s position at ABB could prove embarrassing for the Bush administration since while he was a director he was also active on issues of weapons proliferation, chairing the 1998 congressional Ballistic Missile Threat commission.
The commission suggested the Clinton-era deal with Pyongyang gave too much away because “North Korea maintains an active weapons of mass destruction programme, including a nuclear weapons programme”.
From Zurich to Pyongyang
At the same time, Rumsfeld was travelling to Zurich for ABB’s quarterly board-meetings.
Eberhardt said it was possible that the North Korea deal never crossed the ABB boardroom desk.
“At the time, we generated a lot of big orders in the power generation business [worth] around $1 billion…[so] a $200 million contract was, so to speak, a smaller one.”
When asked whether a deal with a country such as North Korea – a communist state with declared nuclear intentions – should have been brought to the ABB board’s attention, Eberhardt told swissinfo:
“Yes, maybe. But so far we haven’t any evidence for that because the protocols were never disclosed. So maybe it was a discussion point, maybe not,” says Eberhardt.
A Pentagon spokeswoman, Victoria Clark, recently told “Newsweek” magazine that “Secretary Rumsfeld does not recall it being brought before the board at any time”.
It was a long time ago
Today, ABB says it no longer has any involvement with the North Korean power plants, due to come on line in 2007 and 2008.
The company finalised the sale of its nuclear business in early 2000 to the British-based BNFL group.
swissinfo, Jacob Greber
faithinboys, I have two humble suggestions for you.
1. Paragraphs are your friend. They help you organize your point(s).
2. Content is your next best friend. Adding content to your posts helps keep people interested in your thoughts.
Good luck!!
...maybe you want to go right (sic) talking points for Sarandon/Farrell....
You are just too much!!!!
Keep the ironic posts coming! They're brilliant!!!
Check your posts. I think your capitalization may tell us something about you. You never capitalize your own pronoun. Yet you do capitalize some things for emphasis. Hmmm. Is there something to be learned about your self-image, or are you just that sloppy?
What trash is this??? And, how is it relevant?????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.