Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth; Mo1; Poohbah; Howlin; Ligeia
Gaffney attacked Khan based on his father working at a mosque where Zawahiri raise dfunds under a false passport during the Clinton years.

There's NO evidence of culpability on the part of Mr. Kahn. None. Zero. Zilch. Only a connection to Grover Norquist, who go thim a job on the White House staff.

And if these folks were as bad as Gaffney claims, why did they pass Secret Service background checks? Particularly in the case of Mr. Kahn, who was WORKING in the White House every day, and presumably would get a very thorough screening?

And there also is NO evidence that the meeting the aide arranged - and what he was thanked for in the press release - had an effect on the policy the administration is pursuing. It certainly did not interfere with the investigation that's got a USF professor doing the perp walk. Gaffney may be right about that press release, but the meeting itself - there's no proof that anything adverse to the interests of this country has occured as a result.

No reports of Secret Service objections, no indications that it had any effect on policy in a manner that was favorable to the agenda of the group Gaffney criticized at CPAC. For all we know, Bush listened to their concerns and when they left, he put them in a mental circular file.

Gaffney might not be entirely baseless, but I have seen nothing to indicate this is anything more than cries of wolf and guilt by association.
40 posted on 02/21/2003 2:31:57 PM PST by hchutch ("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
And if these folks were as bad as Gaffney claims, why did they pass Secret Service background checks? Particularly in the case of Mr. Kahn, who was WORKING in the White House every day, and presumably would get a very thorough screening?

This is a good point. I'd like to the the scrutiny is better today than it was during the Clinton years.

41 posted on 02/21/2003 2:38:33 PM PST by Ligeia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: hchutch; Sabertooth
Excellent synopsis of the events...as we know them to this point.

I shall add my voice to the " show me the proof" column.
42 posted on 02/21/2003 2:47:48 PM PST by justshe (Eliminate Freepathons! Become a monthly donor. Only YOU can prevent Freepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: hchutch; justshe; Mo1; mhking
And there also is NO evidence that the meeting the aide arranged - and what he was thanked for in the press release - had an effect on the policy the administration is pursuing.

The very point of such meetings is to influence and propmote Administration policy.

Here's some more on the American Muslim Council, from Daniel Pipes:

[The AMC;] 'Mainstream' Muslims?
by Daniel Pipes
New York Post
June 18, 2002

FBI directors don't make a habit of breaking bread with organizations their agents may soon be investigating, perhaps even closing. Robert S. Mueller III, however, is about to make precisely this blunder: On June 28, he is scheduled to deliver a lunch talk to the American Muslim Council.

Mueller accepted this invitation, his spokesman Bill Carter explains, because the FBI regards the AMC as "the most mainstream Muslim group in the United States."

The AMC does indeed seek to convey a message of moderation. Its event this month, for example, is reassuringly titled "American Muslims: Part of America." AMC also boasts of having initiated "many of the historic events marking the entrance of Muslims into mainstream American culture and life."

Public relations, however, is not reality. The FBI may have missed the AMC's true nature because until just days ago its guidelines prohibited it from collecting general information on an organization of this sort. To help it catch up, then, here are five compelling reasons why Director Mueller should break his lunch date:

Apologetics for terrorism: The U.S. government years ago formally certified Hamas and Hezbollah to be terrorist groups; AMC sings their praises.

In 2000, Abdurahman Alamoudi, the group's longtime executive director, exhorted a rally outside the White House with "We are ALL supporters of Hamas. Allahu Akhbar! . . . I am also a supporter of Hezbollah." In January, Alamoudi participated - alongside leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, and al Qaeda - in a Beirut conference whose communique called for a boycott of American products.

The American Muslim Council also has ties to other terrorists. For example, Jamal Barzinji, whose Virginia house and business were raided by federal authorities in an anti-terrorism investigation three months ago, is on the AMC board and will be on the podium at the forthcoming AMC conference.

In December 2000, AMC's Dallas chapter gave an award to Ghassan Dahduli. Eleven months later, he was deported from the United States on account of his connections to al Qaeda and Hamas.

In addition, Alamoudi has vehemently defended Omar Abdul Rahman, the blind sheikh now imprisoned for his role in New York-area terrorism. And AMC has both held press conferences supporting Sudan's National Islamic Front (a Department of State-designated terrorist group) and, in 1992, hosted the NIS's leader on a visit to the United States.

Helping fund-raise for terrorism: The Holy Land Foundation is one of the main American conduits of money to Hamas; not surprisingly, AMC has lavished praise on it, bestowing an award on it for a "strong global vision." When President Bush closed Holy Land after 9/11 for collecting money "used to support the Hamas terror organization," AMC responded by condemning the president's act as "particularly disturbing . . . unjust and counterproductive."

Run-ins with the law: AMC leaders have a long and colorful history of legal problems. Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin (the former H. Rap Brown), a one-time president of AMC's executive board, has the nearly unique distinction of having been listed not just once but twice as one of the FBI's Ten Most Wanted Fugitives. Oh, and today he is sitting out a life sentence without parole for murdering a policeman.

Other employees have less horrible but still troubled resumes. For example, AMC's current director, Eric Vickers, has been admonished, sanctioned or suspended by courts over a 10-year period due to his faulty practice of law.

Hostility to law enforcement: Even after 9/11, AMC's Web site linked to a document, "Know Your Rights" that advises "Don't Talk to the FBI." Indeed, AMC has fervently opposed successive administrations' efforts to stave off terrorism.

And Vickers personally has, to put it delicately, a strained relationship with law enforcement. In his youth, he admits, he was "against the cops." He remains hostile but expresses himself more elegantly today, for example, accusing Attorney General John Ashcroft of "using national security as a pretext" to engage in a pattern of ethnic and religious discrimination.

Hostility to the United States: Its apparent patriotism aside, AMC harbors an intense anti-Americanism. "Let us damn America," Sami Al-Arian, a featured speaker at recent AMC events, has declaimed.

Alamoudi, the longtime executive director, has dilated on the agony of living in a country he loathes: "I think if we are outside this country, we can say oh, Allah, destroy America, but once we are here, our mission in this country is to change it. There is no way for Muslims to be violent in America, no way. We have other means to do it. You can be violent anywhere else but in America."

Far from being "the most mainstream Muslim group in the United States," the AMC is among their most extreme. That explains why George W. Bush in 2000 returned a $1,000 donation from Alamoudi to his campaign.

Rather than endorse AMC by his presence, Robert Mueller should find other lunch companions next Friday. Then he should put the organization under surveillance, ascertain its funding sources, look over its books, and check its staff's visa status.
LINK

Again and again, the evidence points to an inevitable conclusion:

Grover Norquist and his Islamic Institute protege, Suhail Khan, are providing White House access to sympathizers and supporters of terrorism, such as the American Muslim Council.




46 posted on 02/21/2003 3:14:56 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson