Replies

You know cowboy,

Cowboy? COWBOY? Thank you. I haven't felt so good since the first time my wife asked me if I was a cop.

I'm fed up with you claiming here some moral highground.

I ain't perfect, we ain't perfect. But SOMEBODY had to blow the whistle on the wargy of '95.

You can come up with bs like Srebrenica and I'll tell you about Nasir Oric.

Oooh ooh ooh, Nasir Oric, the boogyman. Oooh. Oooh. Interesting cat. Granted, he's a thug, and he certainly did some things that were Not Very Nice. But you know what? The ICTY has dug and dug and dug through the evidence of his war time activities: they'd LOVE to send his butt to the Hague. But every time they dig into his "war crimes" they turn out to be just militarily successful guerilla raids. They have never found ANY evidence he committed atrocities. Did he kill a lot of SBA soldiers? Youbetcha. Did he kill civilians in combat? A few. Did he stick old people into churches and massacre them? No. Zero evidence has been found of that. The ICTY very publicly arrested him a few years ago. They let him go for lack of evidence. Pi$$ed them off too--they would have LOVED to show how evenhanded they were. But you know those damn lawyers and those damn rules of evidence...

Is he a crook? Oh yes, he belongs in jail. But is he a war criminal? So far, doesn't look like it.

Or what about the killings in Vukovar by the ZNG'e, before the serbs liberated the town?

What about the killings in Vukovar before the CROATS "liberated" the town?

The Racak hoax? What about the extermination of native americans, the indians? What about Hiroshima, Nagasaki? What about agent orange in Vietnam? You don't have any moral highground.

Maybe not, but we got drug in there willy nilly. I'm here to tell you this: I, and my friends, didn't kill any indians. We didn't nuke Hiroshima. We weren't in 'Nam. And SOMEBODY had to sort things out. No, we're sinners. But Satan forever points at the sinner and screams "SINNER!" to keep the sinner from interfering with Satan's work. No, we're not perfect. We're just the only thing to put a stop to what happened.

Climb down from your horse and start answering to my questions from the begining of this discussion.

Read on, MacDuff. Or is that Duffovic...

homeagain balkansvet wrote:
"Oooh ooh ooh, Nasir Oric, the boogyman. Oooh. Oooh. Interesting cat. Granted, he's a thug, and he certainly did some things that were Not Very Nice. But you know what? The ICTY has dug and dug and dug through the evidence of his war time activities: they'd LOVE to send his butt to the Hague. But every time they dig into his "war crimes" they turn out to be just militarily successful guerilla raids. They have never found ANY evidence he committed atrocities. Did he kill a lot of SBA soldiers? Youbetcha. Did he kill civilians in combat? A few. Did he stick old people into churches and massacre them? No. Zero evidence has been found of that. The ICTY very publicly arrested him a few years ago. They let him go for lack of evidence. Pi$$ed them off too--they would have LOVED to show how evenhanded they were. But you know those damn lawyers and those damn rules of evidence...

Is he a crook? Oh yes, he belongs in jail. But is he a war criminal? So far, doesn't look like it."

Have you ever been at the Serb graveyard in Bratunac?

Karadjordje

homeagain balkansvet wrote:
"Oooh ooh ooh, Nasir Oric, the boogyman. Oooh. Oooh. Interesting cat. Granted, he's a thug, and he certainly did some things that were Not Very Nice. But you know what? The ICTY has dug and dug and dug through the evidence of his war time activities: they'd LOVE to send his butt to the Hague. But every time they dig into his "war crimes" they turn out to be just militarily successful guerilla raids. They have never found ANY evidence he committed atrocities. Did he kill a lot of SBA soldiers? Youbetcha. Did he kill civilians in combat? A few. Did he stick old people into churches and massacre them? No. Zero evidence has been found of that. The ICTY very publicly arrested him a few years ago. They let him go for lack of evidence. Pi$$ed them off too--they would have LOVED to show how evenhanded they were. But you know those damn lawyers and those damn rules of evidence... Is he a crook? Oh yes, he belongs in jail. But is he a war criminal? So far, doesn't look like it."

The NWO-ICTY has no evidence of crimes against Serbian Civilians, Dshihad fascist?
I don't think so (you got a really nice Mudshahedin fantasy world in your brain):

"Call that safe?

[...] 'Safe' Srebrenica was supposed to be demilitarised but this did not stop Mr Oric's soldiers raiding nearby Serb villages. A recent raid, occuring soon after the collapse of the heavy-weapons exclusion zone around Sarajevo, plus the slow gathering of the West's reaction force, gave General Ratko Mladic, the Bosnian Serb commander, the reasons he needed for extracting the thorn of Srebrenica from the Bosnian Serbs' eastern side. But Mr Oric escaped. [...] "

http://www.balkanpeace.org/cib/bos/boss/boss09.shtml (<- click)

The Economist, "Call that safe?", 15-21 July 1995

You see again - lack of evidence...

Karadjordje