So you are conceding that Bosnia and Serbia are separate countries then? That Serbs have no claim on Srpska? That there is no relationship at all between those living in the borders of Bosnia and those poor folk suffering in Kosova? That the fate that befell the Serbs in Bosnia after they lost that war has absolutely no relationship whatsoever with the fate of the Serbs in Kosova?
Cool. You're the first Serb I've ever met to make that distinction. Thank you. We accept your surrender.
And what the heck does "Kosova" mean? It's just a hoosier-like corruption of a genuinely meaningful word.
Secondly, your laughable don't put words in my mouth- I made no such concessions. Actually B&H is a nation in the UN as fake as it is and Kosovo is still part of Serbia as per the UN also. The claims of the Serbs are also valid (as is the claim of the Croats in their part of B&H as well). I am all for the partition of Yugoslavia but not how it was done or where the borders were allowed.
I think the Serbs had a right to fight to keep Yugoslavia whole and failing that to live in within zones under their control. I am all for autonomy and seperation if those you live with are former Nazis or current Muslims.
Now Church burner, I directed some points towards you @ #326 which you seem to avoid. I see that as intellectual cowardice.
NYC Republican (should I just call you Joe? I know who you are), it is vet who typed his mocking ""Whaaaaa!"" when he laughed off the Kosovo Church destructions and the suffering of Serbs under Albanians which is done not under war conditions but under the UN flag. That is whose company you keep, Joe.