[Emile]

In other words, he had a right to shoot the intruder, only not with the gun. Guess he should have used his finger.

What the DA is implying here is that the desired outcome under the law is that the intruder be the one that survives, unless the homeowner has a "legal" gun. Makes you wonder what side prosecutors are really on.

[boris]

"In other words, he had a right to shoot the intruder, only not with the gun. Guess he should have used his finger."

How about a blowgun, a bow-and-arrow, or a hand grenade?

--Boris