Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thetruckster
DDT was not banned because there was evidence it harmed wildlife or humans. In fact, the Environmental Protection Agency administrative law judge who listened to 9,000 pages of testimony over seven months concluded, ""DDT is not a carcinogenic hazard to man... DDT is not a mutagenic or teratogenic hazard to man... The use of DDT under the regulations involved here do not have a deleterious effect on freshwater fish, estuarine organisms, wild birds or other wildlife."

Despite the findings of the EPA judge, EPA administrator William Ruckelshaus banned DDT in 1972. Ruckelshaus never attended a single hour of the seven months of EPA hearings on DDT. His aides reported he did not even read the transcript of the EPA hearings on DDT. Ruckleshaus was a member and fundraiser for the Environmental Defense Fund -- a group who -- according to a deposition in a federal lawsuit -- conspired to discredit the scientists who defended DDT.

Population control advocates blamed DDT for increasing third world population. In the 1960s, World Health Organization authorities believed there was no alternative to the overpopulation problem but to assure than up to 40 percent of the children in poor nations would die of malaria. As an official of the Agency for International Development stated, "Rather dead than alive and riotously reproducing."

DDT should be hailed as one of the greatest achievements in public health. Instead, unscrupulous activists have made it the poster child for the environmental apocalypse.

Let's hope that in the 21st century our society comes to realize that genocide by junk science is no different than genocide by the gas chamber.

83 posted on 02/20/2003 10:31:43 PM PST by jonascord (Fie on Marxist quotes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: jonascord
"DDT should be hailed as one of the greatest achievements in public health."

I've found that deodorized garlic and brewer's yeast supplements work pretty well to keep away mosquitoes and fleas from both humans and animals. And in Southeast Texas, we have more biting bugs than you can imagine. Maybe eating right could be an even better achievement than DDT. It certainly could help out with the Fattest City in the Nation. And it doesn't destroy eagle eggs.
104 posted on 02/24/2003 11:14:33 AM PST by thetruckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson