[Camachee]

To equate the canning and arrest of a KNOWN terrorist with going after Saddam is mentally, morally, and ethically deficient and proves that one cannot think logically, let alone operate on a NORMAL level.

HAHAHAHAHAHA! Well, that didn't take long, did it? Rush Limbaugh always says that people with weak arguments always resort to name calling.

Have a nice day.

[Jack Stephens]

"Have a nice day."

Yes, I'm done as well.

You folks just try not to hurt yourselves accidentally with all those pitchforks and torches.

[Darksheare]

The weakest argument, mein fruend, is you.
Besides, you are agreeing with me that you have something wrong with you mentally, morally, and ethically since you are also then Confirming that you are equating the canning and arrest of a known terrorist with going after Saddam.
So which is it?
Are you equating the arrest and canning of a known terrorist with ousting Saddam?
Or are you actually going to use some common sense for once and NOT defend a terrorist?
Yes I said:"To equate the canning and arrest of a KNOWN terrorist with going after Saddam is mentally, morally, and ethically deficient and proves that one cannot think logically, let alone operate on a NORMAL level."

And you take that to mean YOU.
So, thus, yuo are stating that you are equating the canning and arrest of Terror-boy with the ouster of Saddam.
Try and weasel out of this.

[Darksheare]

"Don't be any more ABSURD than is absolutely necessary, okay?."
"HAHAHAHAHAHA! Well, that didn't take long, did it? Rush Limbaugh always says that people with weak arguments always resort to name calling."


See anything wrong there?
Both statements are yours, and they are in order of appearance. So, your argument is weak....