To: TLBSHOW
I just took a look at their website and the alternatives to war. Here's one: Controlling or shutting down the Syria-Iraq pipeline would help stop the illegal shipment of oil outside the system of UN financial controls. This is a gaping hole in the sanctions net and a major source of unrestricted revenue for the Baghdad government.
Easy enough, right?
12 posted on
02/20/2003 8:49:31 AM PST by
neefer
To: neefer
Controlling or shutting down the Syria-Iraq pipeline would help stop the illegal shipment of oil outside the system of UN financial controls haha - And how do they propose on doing something like this - since I'm sure the Syrians would have something to say about it? Asking nicely? Sending in the U.N.? Gee, they may have to consider an ARMED CONFLICT (war?).
To: neefer
Controlling or shutting down the Syria-Iraq pipeline would help stop the illegal shipment of oil outside the system of UN financial controls. This is a gaping hole in the sanctions net and a major source of unrestricted revenue for the Baghdad government. You mean, they want to impose sanctions?? And cut off funding for the Iraqui government??
WHAT ABOUT ALL THE STARVING CHILDREN???
Oh, sorry, for a minute I forgot that children only starve from sanctions emposed by a Republican government. Democrat sanctions don't work that way.
Becki
34 posted on
02/20/2003 10:47:13 AM PST by
Becki
(It's time to bomb Saddam!)
To: neefer
But, but, but what about the starving Iraqi children harmed by our
eeeeeevil boycott?
There's no bottom line with these people. Like Mr. Majestic's (Charles Bronson) comment to the mobster just before he kicked the guy's a**, to all of these traitors: "Well, I guess there's just no getting on your good side".
40 posted on
02/20/2003 4:14:12 PM PST by
katana
To: neefer
- Easy enough, right?
I would say a couple dozen carefully dropped 500lb bombs would take that pipeline right out. That can start the peace process.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson