Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: uncbob
I am of the opinion that the word, "state" as in "free state", meant a condtion, not a government body.

By that I mean that the intention was the same as saying "In order to maintain a free condtion.", the right of the people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.

16 posted on 02/20/2003 7:38:12 AM PST by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Flint
I am of the opinion that the word, "state" as in "free state", meant a condtion, not a government body.

By that I mean that the intention was the same as saying "In order to maintain a free condtion.", the right of the people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.

I like your interpretation (though I doubt if a court would interpret it that way). I like to turn it around and think of it this way: The true guarantor of our freedom and liberty is our own conviction that we are, and by right are meant to be, free. Freedom is an attitude more than it is words on a piece of paper. The second amendment reminds us that we have the God given right to self defense of our lives and freedoms and we should reject any politician or party that does not respect and defend that right.

17 posted on 02/20/2003 7:52:45 AM PST by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Flint
I am of the opinion that the word, "state" as in "free state", meant a condtion, not a government body.

Nope you have to realize that when the constitution was written the STATES were the political entities as also spelled out in the 10th Amendment
21 posted on 02/20/2003 9:49:03 AM PST by uncbob ( building tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson