Replies

Interesting page, I have no problem at all with the debunking of perpetual motion. The great skeptic, Eric Krieg, did a much better and up to date job of debunking than this. I wish he would put his page back up.

I'm not talking perpetual motion, and you know that. I'm talking about the difference between practical mechanics and theoretical physics.

I gave you two excellant examples of free energy. You chose to ignore those and respond with a perpetual motion page.

Now, if I were a physicist instead of a mechanic I would easily explain to you why the examples I used are not truly "free energy".

The fact of the matter is that both of those examples work exactly as stated. Anyone can build either of those and see that they work.

As a scientist you can say that both of those examples will consume material over time. As a mechanic I can say if I ain't payin' for it, it's free!

Since I retired I have devoted my shop to crackpot science. I love it. I have built dozens of perpetual motion and free energy machines. It is great fun to have friends mesmerized by the workings of a device that seems to defy logic.

I experimented with hydrogen generation in the 1970's and lost interest. I see nothing today that excites me enough to get back into it.
But, I still believe it can be accomplished. I don't think we'll see the public driving around on water, but I firmly believe hydrogen service stations will be everywhere within twenty years.

I use hydrogen as a welding gas. You can purchase a hydrogen generator through your local welding supply company. It is much cheaper to generate your own hydrogen than it is to buy acetyline. If these generators were built on a commercial scale, I have no doubt they would quickly outperform crude oil refineries.

Anyway, that's this old man's opinion.