Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Neuromancer; freedomworks; dinasour; realpatriot71
Yes, that's the one in post #25...Perdue/Purdue pun intended.(it's hard to not laugh or cry at these articles.)

The very idea of using ebola or any of these incurable horrific illnesses shows the lunatics are running asylum in way too many sections of the globe. At least with nukes there can be some semblance of control.
33 posted on 02/19/2003 1:11:17 PM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG... get rid of Saddam and his ilk before they get rid of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Domestic Church
I think biological weapons make a lot sense for two reasons (1) hard to detect and protect against and (2) kills people but leaves infrastructure intact. Nukes as a weapon have to be located somewhere, even if it's only a suitcase, and give of radiation readings. Plus they destroy both humans and infrastruacture.
36 posted on 02/19/2003 1:26:54 PM PST by realpatriot71 (legalize freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson