Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hunters need to separate themselves from gun nuts
1 posted on 02/19/2003 8:15:26 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RedWing9; technochick99; CHICAGOFARMER; sistergoldenhair; Chi-townChief; BillyBoy; MrJingles; ...
Illinois ping list. If you'd like to be added or removed, please FRMail me.

===============================================

Governor Blagojevich

EMail: governor@state.il.us
Office of the Governor
207 State House
Springfield, IL 62706

Locate and E Mail your representatives in the general assembly

Illinois General Assembly: Senate--Democrats 33, Republicans: 25

Illinois General Assembly: House--Democrats 66, Republicans: 52 or

Find Districts/Officials Using Address

2 posted on 02/19/2003 8:16:45 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Any "reasonable" approach to gun control will result in eventual "confiscation".

It is simply not in the best interst of any Government running a FIAT money system to have citizens in a position to "object" to the "system".

To get rid of the gun issue all we need to do is stop being a socialist state with a huge cap of government people who don't pay any taxes, and get some real money to use.
3 posted on 02/19/2003 8:19:01 AM PST by RISU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Limiting gun purchases to one a month (there is currently no limit) is a practical way to bring down the number of guns in the wrong hands. It permits authorities to go after straw purchasers, who buy them on behalf of felons and others who cannot pass background checks.

Um, if people are limited to one per month, then no one could be involved in "straw purchases" really. How would it help authorities go after such things? Idiot.

Exemptions could be allowed for anyone with a legitimate reason to exceed the limit.

And the person in charge of making this decison will decide that no one other than his buddies have a "legitimate reason".

A "cooling-off" period of 10 days before a buyer can take possession of a gun, up from three, is another measure worth supporting.

Or ten months, or ten years. Why not! Seriously, this is just a step to outlaw altogether(of course). No one is going to "cool down" more over 10 days than 3 days.

And in the absence of a system of federal licensing of gun dealers, Daley's proposal to have the state license them makes sense.

No federal license to be a gun dealer? Say what? This person is on crack.

4 posted on 02/19/2003 8:21:44 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
I am a hunter and a gun nut. More gun laws when existing ones aren't enforced is like more inspectors in Iraq. Excellent plan.
6 posted on 02/19/2003 8:27:03 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (RW&B)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Gov. Blagojevich unsuccessfully campaigned as a state legislator to raise it to $500 but abandoned that during his gubernatorial campaign.

Five bucks is a significant bite if you're trying to stretch a paycheck. 25 starts to limit the gun-owning demographic a bit; five hundred dollars is simply a blatant and transparent attempt to tax gun ownership out of existence and will function in the short term to make criminals out of people who can't come up with that kind of money to exercise a right they've always exercised for free. If this doesn't qualify as a "tax break for the wealthy" then I don't know what does.

Fortunately cooler heads prevailed and Illinois gun owners are safe from that sort of stealth prohibition forever...or at least until the next election.

But what does this "in the absence of federal licensing of gun dealers" mean? Has this newspaper never heard of a Federal Firearms License?

7 posted on 02/19/2003 8:29:52 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Enforcing the existing gun laws is the answer, not throwing more money at the problem by raising fees. Law enforcement already gets huge amounts of money to aid in enforcing gun laws. Perhaps a more accurate accounting by law enforcement as to how much time and actual money are being spent enforcing current gun laws needs to be made to determine if the system is operating efficiently?

What good is a law on the books if it is not being enforced?
Why would a new law be any better? Because it gets more money for law enforcement agencys, not that it makes the system any more efficient towards reducing crime. Rewards should be for efficiency rather than failure.
9 posted on 02/19/2003 8:36:58 AM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Mayor Daley should be more concerned with stopping Night Clubs from burning down.
13 posted on 02/19/2003 8:48:35 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
What are illegal handguns? Why is "gun" violence (whatever that means) worse than other types of violence?
21 posted on 02/19/2003 9:40:47 AM PST by cruiserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
How about one from the mildly amusing Richard Roeper?

http://www.suntimes.com/output/roeper/cst-nws-roep19.html
22 posted on 02/19/2003 10:12:35 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Makes me glad that I don't live in Chicago!
23 posted on 02/19/2003 10:15:24 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
grrrr...
these people will never quit their incrementalism until they are all lined up against a wall...
27 posted on 02/19/2003 10:33:06 AM PST by demosthenes the elder (i say it again: ALL WEAPONS ARE ASSAULT WEAPONS IF USED FOR THAT PURPOSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
more on the Illinois/Chicago gun control issue, in case you have yet to see it.
29 posted on 02/19/2003 10:34:35 AM PST by demosthenes the elder (i say it again: ALL WEAPONS ARE ASSAULT WEAPONS IF USED FOR THAT PURPOSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson; *bang_list
I dunno...
waiting 10 days makes me REALLY mad.
34 posted on 02/19/2003 4:15:36 PM PST by dogbrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson