1 posted on
02/19/2003 8:15:26 AM PST by
SJackson
To: RedWing9; technochick99; CHICAGOFARMER; sistergoldenhair; Chi-townChief; BillyBoy; MrJingles; ...
2 posted on
02/19/2003 8:16:45 AM PST by
SJackson
To: SJackson
Any "reasonable" approach to gun control will result in eventual "confiscation".
It is simply not in the best interst of any Government running a FIAT money system to have citizens in a position to "object" to the "system".
To get rid of the gun issue all we need to do is stop being a socialist state with a huge cap of government people who don't pay any taxes, and get some real money to use.
3 posted on
02/19/2003 8:19:01 AM PST by
RISU
To: SJackson
Limiting gun purchases to one a month (there is currently no limit) is a practical way to bring down the number of guns in the wrong hands. It permits authorities to go after straw purchasers, who buy them on behalf of felons and others who cannot pass background checks. Um, if people are limited to one per month, then no one could be involved in "straw purchases" really. How would it help authorities go after such things? Idiot.
Exemptions could be allowed for anyone with a legitimate reason to exceed the limit.
And the person in charge of making this decison will decide that no one other than his buddies have a "legitimate reason".
A "cooling-off" period of 10 days before a buyer can take possession of a gun, up from three, is another measure worth supporting.
Or ten months, or ten years. Why not! Seriously, this is just a step to outlaw altogether(of course). No one is going to "cool down" more over 10 days than 3 days.
And in the absence of a system of federal licensing of gun dealers, Daley's proposal to have the state license them makes sense.
No federal license to be a gun dealer? Say what? This person is on crack.
4 posted on
02/19/2003 8:21:44 AM PST by
FreeTally
To: SJackson
I am a hunter and a gun nut. More gun laws when existing ones aren't enforced is like more inspectors in Iraq. Excellent plan.
To: SJackson
Gov. Blagojevich unsuccessfully campaigned as a state legislator to raise it to $500 but abandoned that during his gubernatorial campaign. Five bucks is a significant bite if you're trying to stretch a paycheck. 25 starts to limit the gun-owning demographic a bit; five hundred dollars is simply a blatant and transparent attempt to tax gun ownership out of existence and will function in the short term to make criminals out of people who can't come up with that kind of money to exercise a right they've always exercised for free. If this doesn't qualify as a "tax break for the wealthy" then I don't know what does.
Fortunately cooler heads prevailed and Illinois gun owners are safe from that sort of stealth prohibition forever...or at least until the next election.
But what does this "in the absence of federal licensing of gun dealers" mean? Has this newspaper never heard of a Federal Firearms License?
To: SJackson
Enforcing the existing gun laws is the answer, not throwing more money at the problem by raising fees. Law enforcement already gets huge amounts of money to aid in enforcing gun laws. Perhaps a more accurate accounting by law enforcement as to how much time and actual money are being spent enforcing current gun laws needs to be made to determine if the system is operating efficiently?
What good is a law on the books if it is not being enforced?
Why would a new law be any better? Because it gets more money for law enforcement agencys, not that it makes the system any more efficient towards reducing crime. Rewards should be for efficiency rather than failure.
To: SJackson
Mayor Daley should be more concerned with stopping Night Clubs from burning down.
13 posted on
02/19/2003 8:48:35 AM PST by
dfwgator
To: SJackson
What are illegal handguns? Why is "gun" violence (whatever that means) worse than other types of violence?
To: SJackson
To: SJackson
Makes me glad that I don't live in Chicago!
To: SJackson
grrrr...
these people will never quit their incrementalism until they are all lined up against a wall...
27 posted on
02/19/2003 10:33:06 AM PST by
demosthenes the elder
(i say it again: ALL WEAPONS ARE ASSAULT WEAPONS IF USED FOR THAT PURPOSE!)
To: mhking
more on the Illinois/Chicago gun control issue, in case you have yet to see it.
29 posted on
02/19/2003 10:34:35 AM PST by
demosthenes the elder
(i say it again: ALL WEAPONS ARE ASSAULT WEAPONS IF USED FOR THAT PURPOSE!)
To: SJackson; *bang_list
I dunno...
waiting 10 days makes me REALLY mad.
34 posted on
02/19/2003 4:15:36 PM PST by
dogbrain
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson