[Mr. Mojo]

Saddam really has nothing to lose by firing off that bio/chem arsenal of his, at either our troops or Israeli cities (or both). He's a dead man anyway, so why not go out guns-a-blazing? I'd be very surprised if it went down otherwise.

[LdSentinal]

But according to Blix and the United Nations and France and Germany, Saddam has no chemical weapons. Woe is me! I am so confused . . . not.

[smc]

But wait a minute...the French said he doesn't *have* any chemical or biological weapons :-)

[George W. Bush]

I think they won't use these weapons.

The real problem is that a lot of anthrax and other bioweapons are likely to disappear and be sold for very high prices to terror states and terrorist groups. How much would 100 pounds of anthrax be worth to Al Qaeda?

[VOA]

bump