Skip to comments.
US plan for new nuclear arsenal
The Guardian (U.K.) ^
| 02/19/03
| Julian Borger
Posted on 02/18/2003 7:01:17 PM PST by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
02/18/2003 7:01:17 PM PST
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
That our current arsenal was designed for a very different threat environment is undeniable.
An overal; review is certainly past due.
2
posted on
02/18/2003 7:05:42 PM PST
by
jdege
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: Pokey78
Sounds like good stuff to me...Where's the problem ?
4
posted on
02/18/2003 7:08:13 PM PST
by
RS
To: Pokey78
I have always wondered if Neutron bombs could be used to destroy biological agents. Seems like a great idea, but could lead to some dificult decision-making in a crisis.
5
posted on
02/18/2003 7:08:47 PM PST
by
Blackyce
(Who woulda thunk it 2 years ago???)
To: Pokey78
.
R E A L L Y
O L D
N E W S
.
6
posted on
02/18/2003 7:10:45 PM PST
by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: Pokey78
The 'yellow flag' on the nuclear race has been lifted...
Come on in, one and all...the waters "warm"!
7
posted on
02/18/2003 7:12:40 PM PST
by
RCW2001
(We come in Peace but shoot to kill...)
To: RS; Pokey78; *miltech
8
posted on
02/18/2003 7:13:20 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Nuke Saddam ( Bush is thinking about it ))
To: Pokey78
Oh Goody ! I love the smell of burning Beryllium in the morning.
9
posted on
02/18/2003 7:19:22 PM PST
by
SSN558
To: Pokey78
Something in the order of 10-100 tons of TNT would be very useful.
10
posted on
02/18/2003 7:20:51 PM PST
by
LibKill
(Hegemony Now!)
To: jdege
An overal; review is certainly past due.Don't tell the JCS and STRATCOM that...they still prefer a world where they target 2,500 nukes on the XUSSR. It's much neater and more orderly.
11
posted on
02/18/2003 7:22:18 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: RCW2001

Saddam Hussein, call you office!...ummm, I mean any office but the one in this picture. The phones there are "out of order"
12
posted on
02/18/2003 7:23:10 PM PST
by
Orangedog
(Accept No Substitutes)
To: LibKill
The boys at Los Alamos will have to work on that one for a while. The problem is, the smaller the desired yeild, the less chance of having critical mass that makes the big hole in the ground. I don't know if they have done any research before now on sub-critical mass designs.
13
posted on
02/18/2003 7:26:46 PM PST
by
Orangedog
(Accept No Substitutes)
To: Pokey78
Jimmy (NO GUTS) Carter was the wus who ordered the neutron bomb taken off our shelves and it's about FREAKIN' time they put it back! NUKE their A** and TAKE the GAS!
To: belmont_mark
Hurrah for G.W.
15
posted on
02/18/2003 8:21:32 PM PST
by
Orion78
To: Pokey78
16
posted on
02/18/2003 8:26:41 PM PST
by
Orion78
To: Orangedog
The boys at Los Alamos will have to work on that one for a while. The problem is, the smaller the desired yeild, the less chance of having critical mass that makes the big hole in the ground. I don't know if they have done any research before now on sub-critical mass designs.There were recommendations in the 1980s to arm US submarine torpedoes with SKINC (sub-kiloton insertable nuclear component) warheads in the .01-.1 KT range. Also, the W-51 design yielded .022 KT in the late 1950s.
17
posted on
02/18/2003 8:32:30 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: Pokey78
18
posted on
02/18/2003 8:32:37 PM PST
by
Orion78
To: Pokey78
How about a nuclear weapon designed to spread microscopic particles of pork over a 1,000,000 square mile area, covering every square inch?
19
posted on
02/18/2003 8:34:59 PM PST
by
merak
To: merak
about a nuclear weapon designed to spread microscopic particles of pork over a 1,000,000 square mile area, covering every square inch? That's almost four times the area of Texas!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson