Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radio Station To Give American Liberals A Voice
The Guardian (UK) ^ | 2-19-2003 | Duncan Campbell

Posted on 02/18/2003 6:19:14 PM PST by blam

Radio station to give American liberals a voice

New network to offer alternative to rightwing hosts

Duncan Campbell in Los Angeles
Wednesday February 19, 2003
The Guardian (UK)

A liberal radio network in the United States that would challenge the current supremacy of conservative talkshow hosts could be on air by the autumn. The plan has been prompted by the success of the Republicans in last November's mid-term elections and a feeling that the national agenda has shifted to the right. The idea is to create a radio network that would make use of the liberal leanings of the entertainment world to try to change the climate of political debate.

For years, the right, with the likes of the Rush Limbaugh Show or programmes hosted by Oliver North and G Gordon Liddy, have set the agenda, according to supporters of the new network. Now, they say, is the time to fire some broadsides from the left.

Behind the plan are venture capitalists based in Chicago, and Jon Sinton, an Atlanta-based broadcaster, who will be its chief executive. There is already $10m (£6.3m) invested and there are hopes of raising up to $200m.

Two previous attempts to launch such a network, featuring the former New York governor Mario Cuomo and the maverick Texas politician Jim Hightower, failed, though those behind the latest plan are optimistic they will find listeners.

"We believe this is a tremendous business opportunity," Mr Sinton told Associated Press. "There are so many rightwing talkshows, we think it's created a hole in the market you could drive a truck through."

Al Franken, a satirist and writer, has been touted as a possible contender for the role of liberal talkshow host and he is said to be considering the idea. The hope would also be that big-name comedians or actors would also become involved.

Mr Sinton said the idea would be to entertain rather than preach. "We want to take an issue and make it funny and engaging," he said.

Rush Limbaugh reaches 15 million listeners with his syndicated show which taps into conservative issues, currently the French and their position on Iraq, and also such topics as gun control, affirmative action and gay rights.

National Public Radio, the closest thing in America to the BBC, is funded by foundations and subscribers and has 12 million listeners for its Morning Edition programme, and 10 million with All Things Considered, but these are news magazines that aim to give a voice to both sides of an argument. NPR is often accused by the right of having a liberal agenda, a charge routinely levelled at the US media by conservative commentators in much the same way that the Thatcher government accused the BBC of a leftwing bias.

There is already an established leftwing radio network - Pacifica Radio - which, for more than half a century, has given a voice to the left in Berkeley, Los Angeles, New York, Washington and Houston. It runs extensive news and discussion programmes and provided live coverage of the big anti-war rallies in the US last weekend. But Pacifica is short of cash and it is not possible to tune in in many parts of the country.

The left lacks a talkshow host with the charisma of Oliver North, who was convicted of lying to Congress over the Iran-contra affair and who turned his notoriety into a successful radio career with Common Sense Radio. As well as Limbaugh, there is G Gordon Liddy, the former FBI agent jailed for his role in the Watergate burglaries but now boasting a syndicated show broadcast on 232 stations.

Michael Moore, whose film Bowling for Columbine has been nominated for an Oscar, has been mentioned as someone with a liberal agenda who is also funny and can hold his own in an argument.

The plans for the new launch will provoke an argument about the definition of "liberal" - often used as a term of abuse by the American right. A series of best-selling books has claimed that the US media is in the grip of liberals but commentators on the left point to the increasing corporate control of the major media outlets and, for instance, their failure to report the growing anti-war movement until recent days.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: american; liberals; radio; station; voice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: mannaboy
It will suck like they do.

correct and to the point, I LIKE IT!

41 posted on 02/18/2003 7:07:52 PM PST by orbitboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

42 posted on 02/18/2003 7:10:49 PM PST by smith288 (Singes qui capitulent et mangent du fromage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The left lacks a talkshow host with the charisma of Oliver North, who was convicted of lying to Congress
ROTFLOL Just get Clinton to provide "balance." hehehe
43 posted on 02/18/2003 7:20:57 PM PST by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
How many dead ad spots do Ben & Jerry's and Snapple want to flush down the toilet? ,,,,,,,,
Any thought as to who else would be stupid enought to advertise on this puke network?Would be a good list of outfits to boycott.
44 posted on 02/18/2003 7:31:33 PM PST by madrastex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Varmint Al
That is what tics them off.
Maybe if the government ordered more people to listen to the liberals then they would be happy??
Mario who?? My son used to play a video game with Mario.
I didn't know he had a talk show!
45 posted on 02/18/2003 7:35:41 PM PST by jrushing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
They should give that money to the churllren that they always want to do it for.
46 posted on 02/18/2003 7:39:19 PM PST by jrushing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: blam
Is that much whining allowed on the air?
47 posted on 02/18/2003 7:40:27 PM PST by seams2me ("if they pass the reading test, it means they learned to read" GWB 1/8/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mannaboy
A liberal radio station; oh my. Will they be talking when they should have been listening, or vice versa? And would it actually matter?
48 posted on 02/18/2003 7:41:22 PM PST by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen
Excellent point (#28.) To take it one step further, the entire success of Leftism (such as it is) is, in my opinion, due to the emotional, sentimental nature of television as a medium. The idiot box pulls on the heart's strings like a 19th century operetta, and when it tries to appeal to the lowest common denominator, the result is 24 hours of a drugstore novel on every channel.
49 posted on 02/18/2003 7:46:24 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Someone left the cake out in the rain I dont think that I can take it coz it took so long to bake it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mannaboy
Yup. Note that they said Michael Moore can "hold his own in an argument"--not that he argues logically or rationally, just that he can hold his own. If you look over at what the DUnces are saying, you see them saying that liberals' emotion and feelings would carry them on talk radio, a tacit admission of intellectual bankruptcy.
50 posted on 02/18/2003 7:50:55 PM PST by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
WONK

WIPE

51 posted on 02/18/2003 7:55:51 PM PST by Ukiapah Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jejones
I don't know if he can hold his own. Even if he did it would probably spray all over the place!
52 posted on 02/18/2003 7:59:27 PM PST by Ukiapah Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: blam
Radio Station To Give American Liberals A Voice

As if CBS, CNN, ABC, NBC, NYT, Washington Post, Reuters are not enough 24 hour a day liberal-spewing BS.

"We want to take an issue and make it funny and engaging," he said.

In other words, we will try to appeal to emotion because we will fail if we discuss things in an open, intellectually honest manner.

Good luck, leftists. If you really cared, you would take your $200 Million and feed the homeless or save the gay baby whales, or some such. In the free market, you are doomed.

53 posted on 02/18/2003 8:05:07 PM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
Good luck, leftists...$200 Million

Since they are going to be throwing it away, too bad we couldn't figure out a way to let some of it dribble into our hands.

54 posted on 02/18/2003 8:52:14 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Ukiapah Heep

55 posted on 02/18/2003 8:56:28 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: PetroniDE; NormsRevenge
I already know the call letters to two of the stations: KLIE

KFIB

Are they going to have Bernie Ward out of SF write the scripts for them ?

56 posted on 02/18/2003 9:02:35 PM PST by tubebender (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
I wouldn't be surprised if Bubba himself has a time slot.
57 posted on 02/18/2003 9:09:54 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Here's a novel idea for a host, if Franken[stein] doesn't work out...

How about Phil Donahue?

58 posted on 02/18/2003 9:30:12 PM PST by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ukiapah Heep
How about KRAP, or Scare03 Radio?
59 posted on 02/18/2003 9:32:26 PM PST by YOMO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: blam
Most liberals are incapable of carrying on an intelligent debate for very long before they become angry and frustrated at the opposing arguments (because they make sense). At this point they inevitably launch into adhominem attacks, emotional outbursts, name-calling, physical abuse (if you're unlucky enough to be there in person) and the like.

Who's going to want to listen to hours of this kind of crap, even assuming they actually let occasional opposing views through their screening process?

Short of such occasional "debate", the prevailing alternative programming would no doubt be a love-fest of lie-telling, anti-Americanism, and cries for more blood by the parasite class.

Overall, it would be like listening to 3 hours of the Jerry Springer show on the radio, without the added entertainment of actually getting the SEE the degenerate, low-IQ, gutter-trash freaks who call in.

60 posted on 02/18/2003 9:43:10 PM PST by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson