Due to the sensitive nature of this topic and the proliferation of Chinese net-spies on this site, please click Private Reply if you have really workable ideas to counter Chinas multidimensional scheme. Please dont post them in public. The Chinese certainly dont need our help in formulating their counter-counter-measures. I promise to share with you what others are thinking in private. Thank you. God bless you all.
To: FreepForever
To: FreepForever
Seriously, China and N Korea are indeed dangerous. But it doesn't mean that we can't have some fun.
To: FreepForever
To: FreepForever
China is behind much or most of what's been going on. A good way to tell is from the people who will show up and scream at you for saying so. Some others will scream because they know you are right but they are helping to make China strong at the expense of America.
But you forgot the fifth column, the Manchurian Hillaries, who are killing us from within.
Nothing we can do but hope they strike too soon.
To: FreepForever
9 posted on
02/18/2003 1:23:02 PM PST by
TheDon
(The only smoking gun I want to see, is the one which kills Saddam Hussein.)
To: FreepForever
Who has heard of bin Laden three years before 911? That would be....let's see...1998, right? Osama was very much in the news back then. In fact, in August of that year Boy Clinton was lobbing forget-about-Monica missiles at his tent in Afghanistan.
In 1998, it was not necessary to hypothesize a terrorist attack on the WTC. One had already happened, 5 years before. I remember the over-the-top ads by NewsMax claiming that Unrestricted Warfare predicted the 2001 attack -- it seemed like the passages cited were a better fit to the 1993 bombing.
If someone could cite one or more passages from UW that actually call for the kind of WTC attack that actually occurred in 2001, I would appreciate it greatly. There's plenty in UW that should alarm the US; I just don't think that this is one of them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson