Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

French aircraft carrier heads home
BBC News ^ | 02/17/2003

Posted on 02/17/2003 3:04:47 PM PST by dighton

The French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle is returning to France next week, say French officials, apparently scotching suggestions that it might be heading for the Gulf.

The vessel set sail on 4 February from its Mediterranean home port of Toulon, amid speculation that its final destination might be the Gulf.

Officially the vessel was heading for exercises off Crete, but some military analysts believed that it would subsequently join the build-up of military forces in the Gulf.

However, a senior French naval spokesman said on Monday there was “no question” of the Charles de Gaulle going to the Gulf.

“As planned, we will leave Crete again on 21 February and we should arrive back in Toulon on 25 February,” said Lieutenant Commander Bertrand Bonneau of the Charles de Gaulle battle group.

“There is no question at all of us going to the Gulf,” he told the French news agency AFP.

France has been leading European resistance to an early conflict with Iraq, but has been expected to eventually back a war if it believes all diplomatic routes have been exhausted.

Its confirmation that the Charles de Gaulle was returning home appeared to suggest that even in the medium future, it saw no place for conflict.

“I assumed the Charles de Gaulle would steam on to the Gulf,” said Ewan Southby-Tailyour, editor of Jane’s Amphibious and Special Forces.

“I think the statement about it returning home might be just “today’s statement”.

“It is almost certainly directed at the Americans, to try to add credence to their political statement in the UN Security Council.

“They are trying to show the US they really don’t believe we should be going to war yet.”

The French Government had not confirmed speculation that the Crete exercises would lead on to a Gulf deployment, but the Defence Ministry had stressed that the Charles de Gaulle was set for any mission.

“When a ship sails, it goes battle-ready - in terms of its crew, its weaponry and its aircraft, in times of peace or crisis,” said spokesman Christophe Prazuck at the time the vessel set sail.

“A ship like the Charles de Gaulle is not half-operation, or giving an illusion of being operational. It is totally operational.”

The Charles de Gaulle’s three weeks of exercises have included some with a US aircraft carrier, the Harry S Truman, deployed in the Mediterranean ahead of a possible war.

The exercises have taken place between Sicily and Crete, with the Charles de Gaulle based at Souda Bay on Crete, about 250 kilometres (150 miles) south of Athens.

Fighting power

If, as analysts suspect, the Charles de Gaulle eventually turns round once again and sails back towards the Gulf, it will take around two days’ extra sailing to get back to the eastern Mediterranean.

From there - or from closer to the Gulf - the French vessel could be used to deploy French aircraft to join any war on Iraq.

Around 40 aircraft are on board, including fighter jets and reconnaissance planes.

The nuclear-powered Charles de Gaulle has been beset by technical problems over the years, but is a potent symbol of French military power.

It returned in July 2002 from a seven-month mission in the Indian Ocean as part of the war against terror.

Although France is still strongly backing extended weapons inspections, it sees war as a last resort, and is thought to fear being sidelined militarily if war does finally come.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: france; lebateaumaudit; shipmovement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last
To: dighton
Rubber band must have broke
101 posted on 02/17/2003 5:47:00 PM PST by Diana Rose (I hate all things french)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YOMO
Just enough time to get all the IFF codes for the junk they sold to Iraq.
102 posted on 02/17/2003 5:48:12 PM PST by ijcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dighton; aculeus; BlueLancer; Poohbah
The nuclear-powered Charles de Gaulle has been beset by technical problems over the years...
103 posted on 02/17/2003 5:53:42 PM PST by general_re (ACTUALLY, adv.: Perhaps; possibly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dighton
French aircraft carrier heads home

It seems the last gerbil they got from Richard Gere was incapable of running backwards on the big wheel...and no Frog worth his Brie would EVER go near a battle zone without the ability to run away!

104 posted on 02/17/2003 6:03:11 PM PST by Itzlzha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz; aquitaine; dighton; ScholarWarrior; All
The above are 'full size carriers.' Actually that is a far better moniker than 'catapult carrier' because the main thing about them is they have full-size decks while VTOL carriers have short decks.

actually it isn't. The alternatives are

1. CATAR: catapult take-off, Arrested landing

2. STOVL: Short take off, Vertical landing

3. STOBAR: Short takeoff, but arrested landing

US carriers, Charles de Gaulle, Sao Paulo are CATAR
UK carriers, Princep de Asturias, Guseppii Garibaldi, Chakri, Viraat are STOVL
Kuznetsov is STOBAR

but it's not a function of deck size. The new British Future Aircraft Carrier will be the same size as the Kuznetsov, bigger than CdG, Sao Paulo, but will be STOVL.
Which is actually a better system than STOBAR, but in practice is restricted to a single aircraft type,(Harrier now, JSF in future), whereas STOBAR can operate any high performance jet a CATAR can, at slighly reduced take-off weight (maybe 80% of max Catapult weight)

Also the Russians are keeping the Kuznetsov (Midway, UK CVF sized), what they have sold to india is the older STOVL Gorshkov (Charles de Gaulle sized),
which will be converted to STOBAR.

Also a gleam in the Indain navy's eye: the STOBAR ADS

105 posted on 02/17/2003 6:09:09 PM PST by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Action at Oran (Operation 'Catapult') - Adm Somerville arrives with Force H off the French Algerian base of Mers-el-Kebir near Oran. French Adm Gensoul is offered a number of choices to ensure his fleet with its four capital ships stays out of Axis hands. All are turned down and, at around 18.00, Force H opens fire on the anchored ships. "BRETAGNE" blows up and the "Dunkerque" and "Provence", together with other ships, are badly damaged. Battlecruiser "Strasbourg" and some destroyers manage to break out in spite of attacks by aircraft from "Ark Royal", and reach Toulon in the south of France.

Three days later the damaged "Dunkerque" is torpedoed at her moorings by Ark Royal's Swordfish. The tragic and unhappy episode is over as far as Oran is concerned.

A more peaceful solution to the French naval presence is found at Alexandria. Adm Cunningham is able to reach agreement with Adm Godfrey on the demilitarisation of battleship "Lorraine", four cruisers and a number of smaller ships.

No action is taken against the French warships at Algiers and Toulon.Here the rest of ships were scuttled in November 1942

"For the Royal Navy an unhappy but in British eyes, necessary duty has been carried out against our former French allies. French anger and bitterness is understandably considerable."


106 posted on 02/17/2003 6:21:22 PM PST by ijcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: dighton
As corruption vies with cowardice for the French national characteristic, Chirac puts Charles DeGaulle up for bid. . .


One million francs from the tall thin dark man in the turban. . .

107 posted on 02/17/2003 6:29:20 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery, das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Somebody who is handy with a photo editor should put some white flags all over that carrier....
108 posted on 02/17/2003 6:34:54 PM PST by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; cardinal4
The Jean Bart engaged USS Massachusetts at Casablanca just prior to Operation TORCH in November 1942. Massachusetts can be seen at Battleship Cove, just off of I-95 in Fall River, MA.
109 posted on 02/17/2003 6:39:07 PM PST by Ax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
Thank you for the refersher course.
110 posted on 02/17/2003 6:58:04 PM PST by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Run, run, there is going to be a war soon and we don't want you toads to get hurt.
111 posted on 02/17/2003 7:00:26 PM PST by Porterville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
"“A ship like the Charles de Gaulle is not half-operation, or giving an illusion of being operational. It is totally operational.”"

Which, for a French ship, means it is totally prepared to surrender. Exactly what it's doing. So, obviously, for the French, the de Gaulle, IS fully operational.

112 posted on 02/17/2003 7:04:28 PM PST by AlguyA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley
Didn't the CDG lose a screw while underway recently?

I don't know, but Jacque Chirac has a screw loose!

113 posted on 02/17/2003 7:04:39 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dighton
So much for "La Force de Frappe"
114 posted on 02/17/2003 7:10:27 PM PST by dennisw ( http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
.... homeless shelter in Gdansk.

Now that's funny!!! I love it!

115 posted on 02/17/2003 7:11:52 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dighton

116 posted on 02/17/2003 7:22:37 PM PST by doug from upland (May the Clintons live their remaining days in orange jumpsuits sharing the same 6 x 9 cell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
French aircraft carrier heads home

That's about all the French are good for.

117 posted on 02/17/2003 7:36:43 PM PST by scott7278 (Peace had it's chance, now it's bombs away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse
The attack was at Oran (Algeria) on July 3rd. 1940. The British attacked the French fleet to prevent it from falling into the hands of the Germans.
118 posted on 02/17/2003 7:37:55 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: dighton
When compared to USS Reagan, the french aircraft carrier is a row boat. Frogs can't survive in the open ocean, a muddy pond is more to it's liking.
119 posted on 02/17/2003 7:39:31 PM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
I think allied command ordered them out of the theatre...

You cant have non-combatent aircraft carriers in an active theatre of war...

War is coming...
120 posted on 02/17/2003 7:40:02 PM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson