Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBtoo
I think non-seq was referring to the Confederate Constitution on the issue of safeguaring slave imports, not the US constitution.
389 posted on 02/23/2003 8:16:09 AM PST by mac_truck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]


To: mac_truck
It sounded to me that non-sec was implying that the African slave trade was still going ahead full steam at the time of the Civil War, and that the Confederates wanted to preserve it though it had ceased years before.
391 posted on 02/23/2003 8:40:40 AM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson