Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laotzu
Was the "Civil War" about slavery, or was secession about slavery?

The south seceded because it felt that the institution of slavery was at stake. Free states were gaining ground in the congress. Lincoln carried the free states ... it was the end of power for slave states. They bolted immediately. That is the history. Deny it if you will. But those are the facts.

235 posted on 02/20/2003 3:24:35 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: jlogajan
"The south seceded because..."

Fascinating. (why dodge the question?)

Was the "Civil War" about slavery, or was secession about slavery?

If the war was about slavery, why did the North continue to enslave their fellow man after those in the South were free?

The North had slaves before the South, and maintained them after. From where do you pretend to get the moral authority to criticise?

Canada freed their slaves before any of the "United States". Are the Canadians morally superior to the North?(after all they are more socialist)

252 posted on 02/21/2003 9:21:24 AM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson