Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laotzu
Despite that the South did not ever seek to rule the North, most refer to it as the "Civil War". Why? A convenient mistake?

An early-20th Century political compromise, between the "War of the Rebellion" (the official name used by the victorious north) and "The War Between the States" (which Southerners were lobbying for).

161 posted on 02/19/2003 2:31:12 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
""War of the Rebellion" and "The War Between the States""

Both of these are accurrate & appropriate labels.

"Civil War" greatly misrepresents that conflict. It was most definitely not a Civil War. Yet, that is the label chosen.

I suggest this is/was not merely an imbecilic mistake. It is/was a strategic, purposeful decision designed to instill a most desired belief & attitude.

If the infliction of war on the South was so noble; why the need for this fundamental deception? (hint: it wasn't noble or just....it was shameful)

187 posted on 02/20/2003 7:27:54 AM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson