Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ggekko
The mere fact that Southern combatants in G&G are not protrayed as wild-eyed pro-slavery fanatics should not cause this movie to be controversial.

I suppose not, but it has been said that the film fudges "Stonewall's" views on slavery to make them more acceptable to the contemporary audience. If that is true, it could be cause for concern.

That is not why the South fought, in large measure.

It depends on what you mean by "the South." If you're talking about the average soldier you're probably right. If you're referring to those who led the secessionist movement, you're probably not.

128 posted on 02/19/2003 11:03:49 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: x
I suppose not, but it has been said that the film fudges "Stonewall's" views on slavery to make them more acceptable to the contemporary audience.

I saw this movie on the 16th. I don't remember hearing Stonewall ever mention slavery.

132 posted on 02/19/2003 11:42:00 AM PST by SCDogPapa (In Dixie Land I'll take my stand to live and die in Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: x
"the film fudges "Stonewall's" views on slavery...."

If that is the case then it is extremely unfortunate. We have managed to gradually debunk 50 years of Liberal mythmaking concerning Liberals icons such as FDR and JFK. Conservatives should not now do the same thing.
160 posted on 02/19/2003 2:28:46 PM PST by ggekko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson