Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Wizard
I was under the assumption that the next resolution would not have the super veto. I thought each of the 15 countries on the Security Council would have a vote - Yes, No or Abstain.

We need nine votes in the Security Council for a new resolution. The US, UK, Spain and Bulgaria are definite yes. China, Russia and France are thought to abstain. Germany and Syria are no's. If the below article is correct then we will get Chile, Angola, Cameroon and Guinea. No way Pakistan will vote yes. So that leaves Mexico. I would like to think Mexico would vote with the US


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/02/14/wirq214.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/02/14/ixnewstop.html&secureRefresh=true&_requestid=144968
75 posted on 02/17/2003 9:40:06 AM PST by Republican Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Republican Red
I was under the assumption that the next resolution would not have the super veto.

Nope - it's a Security Council action, which provides veto authority to any/each of the five permanent members (the original Nuclear Club) for every vote.

80 posted on 02/17/2003 10:10:39 AM PST by alancarp (online anti-Hollywood idiots petition: http://www.ipetitions.com/campaigns/hollywoodceleb/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson