Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: templar
H2 power clearly is not the Panacea The left (Jeremy Rifkin, for example) thinks it is. It is clearly not a source of energy but a medium through which energy may be transfered.

That said, Honda's huge initial outlay for prototypes is not surprising. It may be foolish to rule out initially difficult concepts because of apparent lack of practical feasibilty in the present.

I'd like to see other assessments from purely scientific bodies--or as free from politics as is possible.

15 posted on 02/17/2003 8:48:32 AM PST by Interious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Interious
H2 power clearly is not the Panacea The left (Jeremy Rifkin, for example) thinks it is.

The only thing that would satisfy the Left is a 'free energy' system. And, even then, they would find something environmentally objectionable with it. I don't pay much attention to the leftist 'solutions'. The burden of developing the future is on the Right side of the political system.

You're right about Honda's initial investment. I doubt that Honda has put out as much money as they have for the fun of it. They seem to think there is a feasable future in the technology.

25 posted on 02/17/2003 9:06:30 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson