[Howlin]

"We" weren't discussing that; we were discussing your snotty remarks to posters on this thread, which, by the way, is about Iraq!

[DAnconia55]

"We" weren't discussing that; we were discussing your snotty remarks to posters on this thread, which, by the way, is about Iraq!

"WE" were discussing this the moment you opened your mouth to type :

Some on here believe they and they alone can read and interpret their copy of the Constitution and have the correct answers to any and all things under the stars; and no matter WHAT you might believe, you can damn sure bet they think you're wrong.

Which was directed at me, and entirely out of place, seeing how I was only expressing my opinion that BOTH Kondrake and Barnes are compromised 'journalists'. And anyone who is reading this - with a brain and the ability to scroll back, can see...

Which is NOT A Constitutional issue.

---

I repeat, (since you brought it up directly ):

Which parts of the Constitution would you like to openly debate, without crawling for help?

I'll use the Founders own words.
And you can use what you believe to be the modern and politically convienient Republican rebuttal.

[edwin hubble]

Something's in the water here...somehow this thread has gone into fantasy land.

I've met Fred Barnes. He is smart and thoughtful.
His article is Dead On.

The left has Flipped. They used to support legitimate wars of liberation. Now they support the fascists.

I think we should close this thread with that.