Replies

I will explain it this way: I make the decision as to who carries and who doesn't carry on my property.
You would be in the latter category, since you seem to not understand other people's property rights.
poohbah

______________________________________

In a truly constitutonal RKBA society, the entire nation would uphold the right as does, [or did] the State of New Hampshire. Anyone could carry concealed at any time anywhere.
Thus, there would be no real basis or reason to search anyone coming onto your property for weapons, or for any other reason.
This would also apply to relativily 'unregulated' airlines, as sneakyypete noted ours once were.
219 posted by anono_bod

____________________________________

The only real basis that I would need in order to justify my searching anyone wanting to enter my property for a weapon, is just that I wanted to.
It's my property, and if I so desire to search anyone before entering, I'll do so.
If you object to being searched, then you don't have to come on to my property.
220
_____________________________________

Of course you could search everyone, thats not the point.
- You wouldn't do so, if you wanted customers. Free trade would weed out paranoid shopkeepers. Or airlines who refused passengers the right of self defense.

You wouldn't do so, if you wanted customers. Free trade would weed out paranoid shopkeepers. Or airlines who refused passengers the right of self defense.

Firearms favor the few and organized over the many and disorganized. And the bad guys will be carrying, as well. Do not assume that they are rational and easily deterred by others carrying weapons; they will merely assume that they might have to shoot a few would-be heroes early on, and be watchful after that.

And Ted Nugent's quote about the BATF is instructive: "At my hunting camp, you may choose to partake of firearms; you may choose to partake of alcohol and tobacco. However, if you are partaking of alcohol and tobacco, you are not allowed to partake of firearms at the same time. That's why the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms is such a bad idea."

Bars that didn't outlaw firearms would lose a higher percentage of customers per year than those that did.