[anono_bod]

I will explain it this way: I make the decision as to who carries and who doesn't carry on my property.
You would be in the latter category, since you seem to not understand other people's property rights.
poohbah

______________________________________


In a truly constitutonal RKBA society, the entire nation would uphold the right as does, [or did] the State of New Hampshire. Anyone could carry concealed at any time anywhere.
Thus, there would be no real basis or reason to search anyone coming onto your property for weapons, or for any other reason.
This would also apply to relativily 'unregulated' airlines, as sneakyypete noted ours once were.

[Luis Gonzalez]

The only real basis that I would need in order to justify my searching anyone wanting to enter my property for a weapon, is just that I wanted to.

It's my property, and if I so desire to search anyone before entering, I'll do so.

If you object to being searched, then you don't have to come on to my property.

[Luis Gonzalez]

There is no such thing as an "unregulated" business anywhere, where government regulations do not apply, the business itself can set some.

Just expecting employees to show up for work as scheduled is a regulation.

[Poohbah]

In a truly constitutonal RKBA society, the entire nation would uphold the right as does, [or did] the State of New Hampshire. Anyone could carry concealed at any time anywhere.

Wrong. I could demand, as a condition of entering onto my property, that anyone (or everyone) not carry their weapons.

Thus, there would be no real basis or reason to search anyone coming onto your property for weapons, or for any other reason.

My private property rights are more than sufficient.

This would also apply to relativily 'unregulated' airlines, as sneakyypete noted ours once were.

No, it would not.

Amazing how some folks demand absolute fealty to THEIR rights, and demand the privelege of urinating on everyone else's.