Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
I assert that we can and do make this observation as a direct result of language

Do you assume that infants are not conscious? How about people born deaf prior to the invention of sign language?

If you believe these people are conscious, do you have any evidence other than non-verbal behavior and similarity of brain structure?

980 posted on 02/25/2003 6:05:57 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
Thank you for your posts!

I would think there is a burden to prove that physical laws are deterministic. This was an assumption for centuries, but only an assumption. There has been evidence against it as far back as Newton and the three body problem. Which, by the way, has no solution nor any prospect of solution.

Er, strong determinism is the casual effect of physical laws. And I wouldn’t be so quick to give up on solutions to the three body problem:

A new solution to the three body problem - and more by Bill Casselman

More on the new solution: Montgomery (pdf)

Do you assume that infants are not conscious? How about people born deaf prior to the invention of sign language? If you believe these people are conscious, do you have any evidence other than non-verbal behavior and similarity of brain structure?

Infants and deaf persons are conscious, they have language capability. The one is a blank slate and the other will use difference forms of language.

Here’s an interesting discussion for lurkers: Language, Thought and Consciousness

982 posted on 02/25/2003 9:10:58 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 980 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson