Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
I recall one of the reviews of Crick's work said that it would be necessary to run many test removing different parts of the human brain to test the theory (and that would never happen in our society.)

It happens all the time due to accidents and cerebrovascular accidents. It's also possible to study localization of function with real-time MRI scans. Non-locality of memory has been known for decades. It is one of the reasons I believe artificial intelligence is beyond my lifetime, because no one knows how it works.

None of this argues for any non-physical property of the mind. Just because memories are spread out doesn't mean they aren't embodied.

From the standpoint of ID vs evolution, I find it interesting that the level of redundency in the brain is staggering, compared, say to the redundency of the space shuttle's heat shield.

811 posted on 02/22/2003 2:16:50 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 807 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
Thank you so much for your post!

Non-locality of memory has been known for decades. It is one of the reasons I believe artificial intelligence is beyond my lifetime, because no one knows how it works.

Indeed, non-locality of memory does not favor Crick's "Astonishing Hypothesis." I hadn't heard of the salamander experiments, so they were particularly interesting.

None of this argues for any non-physical property of the mind. Just because memories are spread out doesn't mean they aren't embodied.

Likewise, none of this argues against a non-physical property of the mind.

817 posted on 02/22/2003 2:30:13 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 811 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson