Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edsheppa
True enough, but it is certainly the best method we've come up with so far for developing reliable knowledge about nature. So if a question is about nature it is the method that should be used.

...and used along with the intuition that catalyzes the scientific process and done so without a prejudiced extension of philosophical naturalism regarding what is outside of the scientific process to determine.

682 posted on 02/19/2003 5:19:01 PM PST by unspun (Christ-informed, American constitutional republic: Yes. Libertarian & objectivist revisionisms: No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]


To: unspun
...and done so without a prejudiced extension of philosophical naturalism ...

Why single out that specific religious impulse?

692 posted on 02/19/2003 7:12:29 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson