Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jennyp
The concept of contingency does not depend on time.

And yes, there IS a reason to conclude that the First Cause is a person--because WE are persons. Nothing can give what it does not have.

332 posted on 02/16/2003 9:02:27 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan
The concept of contingency does not depend on time.

It doesn't? So, an event can be contingent on something that hasn't happened yet? Whoa!

And yes, there IS a reason to conclude that the First Cause is a person--because WE are persons. Nothing can give what it does not have.

Hmmm... So, God must have a belly button because we have belly buttons? God must have DNA because we have DNA? God must be material because we are material?

338 posted on 02/16/2003 9:36:09 PM PST by jennyp (http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson