[TaxRelief]

Actually, you both need to answer each others questions.

1) Unspun, LW wants you to tell him why we keep tying belief in with "fact".
2) LW, unspun wants to know if you could have faith in God if he lowered himself to explaining everything with lab demonstrations? (See the contradiction?)

[unspun]

1) Unspun, LW wants you to tell him why we keep tying belief in with "fact".

Well, I believe that's because we like to look for two things:

1. the bases for belief.
2. additional evidence, which may refine and help us to understand our beliefs, and/or which will defend what we believe against those who believe otherwise and promulgate conflicting beliefs, and/or which will hopefully help to convince others of the imperative of what we believe to be imperative.

[LogicWings]

LW, unspun wants to know if you could have faith in God if he lowered himself to explaining everything with lab demonstrations? (See the contradiction?)

Then why do they keep trying? When is ID except the very attempt to find that place of lowering?

See the contradiction?