You're just not the arbiter of such things, LW.
spiritual does not equal unreal
That is an illogical assumption. There is much evidence of the spiritual in our world and concomitantly, there is no way of disproving it.
Heads I win, tails you lose. But then you're only fooling yourself.
Science as defined is the arbiter, not me. You cast stones where there are none to be had.
spiritual does not equal unreal
Never said it did.
That is an illogical assumption.
It isn't enough in the statement to considered logical or illogical. It is merely an assumption. You demonstrate a poor understanding of logic. Don't worry, you have lots of company.
There is much evidence of the spiritual in our world and concomitantly, there is no way of disproving it.
So you say. I keep asking for such 'evidence' and all anybody ever does is make the assertion again. Fact is there is no such evidence, and what you consider evidence opens the door to other 'evidence' that would contradict it. I have already pointed out the power of 'believing' that is distinctly separate from evidence of 'spiritual' reality. If you believe it is true, nothing on earth can prove otherwise, no matter how far removed from reality that belief is.