[unspun]

You just can't be a creationist and a scientist at the same time.

It seems you may not be getting much from this thread, FRiend VR? Tell me if you wish, just how it is that someone cannot believe in our Creator (who has given us our unalienable rights, to life, liberty, etc.) if one believes in some form of evolution.

Also, have you seen that newer thread from betty boop? You might find it thought provoking.

Blessings, Arlen

[unspun]

I presume that is what you meant really meant: "evolutionist" where you actually wrote, "scientist?"

scientist
\Sci"en*tist\, n. One learned in science; a scientific investigator; one devoted to scientific study; a savant.
fm. Webster's Unabridged

[VadeRetro]

Tell me if you wish, just how it is that someone cannot believe in our Creator (who has given us our unalienable rights, to life, liberty, etc.) if one believes in some form of evolution.

Tell me if you wish, just where I said that. I believe that I would argue the opposite, since many counterexample are known to me. (Junior and Lurking Libertarian come prominently to mind.) But so many people who say they believe, for one example, "ID, which is not creationism, is completely compatible with evolution" also demand that a lot of completely bogus "evidence against evolution" (heavily borrowed from the ignorant Luddite YECs) be taught in the schools. Why?