To: js1138
Ah, but the mere noticing of a pattern in the data is an induction that something is going on above the chance level. This is a severe no-no anytime a creationist wants it to be.
To: VadeRetro; PatrickHenry; js1138
Aw shucks, fellas...
[blush]
1,521 posted on
03/09/2003 1:05:42 PM PST by
Condorman
(My 2 cents now worth $1.87 due to increased demand.)
To: VadeRetro; js1138
On further review, we're always whacking creos for using "proof" when they mean "irrefutable evidence to support" so I should avoid the same mistake. Title changed to "Condorman on whether models precede irrefutable evidence."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson