Wow, this is what I am talking about. The application of a little common sense will enable a person to overcome the strict legalistic misinterpretation of the data.
My friend you continue to focus on the negative. I have clearly restated that Darwin was oblivious to the complexity we now see, in subsuquint posts. Step back from the data and consider the obvious.
1439 - Darwin was quite unaware of the sophisticated coding that is embedded in DNA. He was also unaware of the magnificance of the living cell, as our modern technology enables us to know.
1429 - There are so many of these types of these "fine-tuned developments" that when one considers the mathematical probabilities of all of the biological "just so happens" it becomes absurd.
1429 - But the intricacy of the design makes the atheists efforts countless. Therefore we are completely confident that any discoveries, by whoever feels compelled to do the research, can only further convince people that there is a God.
1370 - Biologists and chemists continue to marvel at the complexities of something seemingly as simple as the single living cell. I have heard a living cell described as more complicated than a space shuttle production facility.
Hope you are well!
I'm quite certain that Darwin would have been thrilled to learn about the mechanisms of inheritance, and to learn that there is an observable process for generating the tiny changes in the bloodline that his theory required.